PSA: Just because a champion deserves a VGU does not mean they will get one soon.

Mister Support··4 votes·302 views

Been seeing a lot of posts lately speculating who the next VGUs will be after Urgot and Evelynn. (hint, it's not Aatrox, he's a GU not a VGU. Different teams at Riot work on those.) Now most of the speculation has been around which champion "deserves" it the most with champions such as Mordekaiser Chogath Blitzcrank Amumu DrMundo Swain Nunu . The problem with this logic is that simply forcing champions onto the VGU because they deserve one is not a good idea and here's why: if ideation for a VGU is not already underway when a champion is set for a rework it will cause the gameplay side of things to be rushed.

Remember what's been seen in the past when reworks are rushed? Take a look at any of the class updates for evidence, those updates are case in point of teams being rushed too hard to finish up reworks to meet deadlines and plenty of those reworks ended up being so difficult to balance afterwards that they needed heavy attention patch after patch (Caitlyn, Corki in the mid lane specifically, Graves ,KogMaw, Leblanc, Malzahar, Maokai with full AP saplings, Mordekaiser,Rengar, Syndra ,Zac ).

There are also some cases of reworks being rushed and going off of the original theme of the champion, such as Leblanc changing from Assassin to Kite mage (that still does damage of an Assassin). Or themes being played on so much that game health and interactive play are put at risk Garen 's Villian mechanic, KogMaw pre-revert Machine Gun, etc.

What I'm trying to get at (here's TL;DR) is that you shouldn't expect a champion to be next on the VGU list just because they deserve it. VGUs take time and you have to be patient if you want the full potential of a champion's theme to be drawn out in terms of gameplay.

5 Comments

Monotachi1 votes

A good example of this is the upcoming VGU, Urgot. He was on the VGU list since 2013 but champs like Fiora and GP were done before him because Riot simply didn't have a good theme/gameplay for Urgot to go off from back then. Nothing is worse than doing a VGU for the sake of it, since it will likely mean the end-product will be rushed - as seen with class updates.

Sun Wu Ryuumoku1 votes

I agree with most... but i don't think Zac should be listed there.

Kloqdq1 votes

I mean a lot of the problem characters you listed just come down to the horrible class updates. Those were rushed. VGUs however have a lot of thought put into them before they are released and they have a theme to work with. The class updates were bad because they were trying to just updated a older champion but in turn really screwed up a whole bunch. LeBlanc, Mord and Rengar all got gutted and now barely work or are still a problem. Kog had to be reverted. Malz is a terrible mid now and is forced support. Corki is just too good in mid. Caitlyn is like never bad. Most of them deserved a VGU rather than a gameplay update and even then they deserved a more focused class update like Rek'Sai.

Mister Support1 votes

I agree with this completely, and that's why I'm saying we shouldn't expect a champion to go on the VGU list just because they need one, it would most likely end up a rushed job that doesn't bring the full potential of a champion out.

Kloqdq1 votes

Yeah! It's why I am really happy they stopped with Class updates. They always felt rushed and not right. Then we get shit like WW or Poppy that come out just feeling good. They are better for it. Class updates felt like, welp we need to do this by X time or we are going to be in trouble. VGUs are nice because there isn't really a time period, we just hear about how their development is going.

More from Gameplay

More by Mister Support