Your rating system is Bonkers

Fraggleroc·Mar 17, 2016·4 votes·558 views

Carried the whole team with Tahm 11/0/20, made all the plays... did everything... and I got an A rating... fricking A

What the hell? Is the system bonkers?

12 Comments

GoosetardMar 17, 20163 votes

Upvoted only for the word bonkers.

1 800 MID LANEMar 17, 20161 votes

You had a lot of kill participation. Great. What did you do for them otherwise?

FragglerocMar 17, 20161 votes

{quoted}

You had a lot of kill participation. Great. What did you do for them otherwise?

I hope I can show u the replay =(

Doing all that work and only getting an A is demoralizing to say the least

1 800 MID LANEMar 17, 20161 votes

Did you help with objectives and warding? Because those two have a bigger impact than KDA. I had a game where I went 1-8-5 and got an A- because I warded and had participation in almost every objective taken other than one dragon.

FragglerocMar 17, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Did you help with objectives and warding? Because those two have a bigger impact than KDA. I had a game where I went 1-8-5 and got an A- because I warded and had participation in almost every objective taken other than one dragon.

Tahm is the walking ward... i facecheck brushes for teammates... put down wards when i could. Srsly a rating system based on warding would be inaccurate at best.

How do they define participation in a fight for dragon? Tahm does not much damage to dragon- I was standing on the perimeter guarding my teammates.

1 800 MID LANEMar 17, 20161 votes

Participation = dealing damage or healing allies doing the damage

The rating system being based partially on warding is anything but inaccurate. Vision is a huge part of this game.

FragglerocMar 17, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Participation = dealing damage or healing allies doing the damage

The rating system being based partially on warding is anything but inaccurate. Vision is a huge part of this game

Yes. "Timely" vision is important. Ward position at whichever stage of the game is important.

Quantity of wards, however, is arguable. Quality... not quantity.

Mr Broken WingsMar 17, 20161 votes

Wards, objectiveparcitipation, cleared wards, even lasthits count on that. You can have 30-0 and have 0 cs as midlane akali and wont get a S probably.

FragglerocMar 17, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Mr Broken Wings,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jmNAkirN,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-03-17T08:53:20.906+0000)

Wards, objectiveparcitipation, cleared wards, even lasthits count on that. You can have 30-0 and have 0 cs as midlane akali and wont get a S probably.

I did intentionally gave away some cs to teammates later in the game. Tahm doesn't need a lot of cs. I got almost full items in the end. 5 1/2 items. I gave away the cs for the team.

Mr Broken WingsMar 17, 20161 votes

{quoted}

I did intentionally gave away some cs to teammates later in the game. Tahm doesn't need a lot of cs. I got almost full items in the end. 5 1/2 items. I gave away the cs for the team.

the system doesnt care, its all about statistics.

SaiannaMar 17, 20161 votes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOocyQq95Zc

Valderis VandalaMar 17, 20161 votes

Question: Did you play against a team/player in your opposite role with higher MMR or lower? Is there a way to tell?

I ask because its a possibility (and this is just a guess), that mastery score could be influenced by MMR. Think about it, its easier to do well against a bad opponent then it is against a good opponent, so there is the possibility that your teams MMR gets compared to your opponents team MMR in order to influence your mastery score and thus your grade. Or maybe your personal MMR gets compared to the MMR of the person playing your role's opposite. Or both.

So even if you played really well, your score and grade are perhaps diminished because you fought opponents below your skill level?