New conqueror needs to be melee only

{quoted}

Okay, since your are completely unable to neither watch nor reason for mages using Conqueror I will go ahead and point more examples.

No one was obligated to disprove your argument. You must be capable of supporting it first and then those who oppose you will debate with you.

Ryze, Cassiopeia, These make sense.

Ahri, Vel'Koz, AS, Syndra, and Vladimir.

None of them would use the new conqueror. New conqueror works as follows. Each attack/ability provides a stack. This stack provides adaptive force. At full stacks, 10% of the damage dealt is true damage and 10% of the true damage provides healing. This means the only time the adaptive damage takes effect would be AFTER the stack has been gained. Which means in order for any of these champions to make use of the 70+ adapative damage at level 18 they would need to be in combat and constantly dealing damage to a target, because a single spell cannot proc a stack of conqueror so they cannot get 5 stacks from Qing an enemy team.

The average amount of damage gained from conqueror, therefore, is lower than utilizing the combo of absolute focus/perfect storm because that adaptive damage takes effect for subsequent attacks AFTER the stack is gained. This is why Ryze, Cass, and POSSIBLY azir can use conqueror because their cooldowns are so low. Every other mage you listed cannot spam their ablities, with the exception of syndra, and having tos tack conqueror for its effect would only lead to them getting jumped on and killed as well has having inferior damage to someone utilizing the combo I listed above and also missing out on important runes that enhance their damage even further.

Let us go one by one since I know you're going to spout some nonsense.

Ahri: Lowest CD is on Q which is 4.2. In lane everyone does their best to respect it, and being a skillshot means it can be dodged. She would need to rely on AA's to gain stacks. Even if she goes all in and does REWRQR, the stack bonus of 75 adaptive damage would only be gained after the 5th ability, her Q. So only a single ability is benefitting from max stacks. Perfect storm/absolute focus is superior for burst.

Vel'koz: Lowest CD is on Q. Each one provides 1 stack. He cannot get max procs because each stick of his channeled ability provides only 1 stack, and even if it doesnt, it is a slow moving beam. He is also a burst mage. So again, perfect storm/absolute focus would be superior.

Aurelion sol: Stacks it far too slowly to have it be of use. He would also prefer other runes because of nnate weaknesses.

Syndra: 2.8s on her Q. The only one who would likely be capable of utilizing it to great effect, the only issue is that again, it is a skillshot and the duration is 3s. This leaves very little room for error and like Ahri and vel'koz, she is a burst mage.

Vladamir: He uses phase rush because he cannot stack conqueror nearly quick enough for it to be of use.

NONE of the examples you listed would prefer to utilize conqueror.

Two last things.

Hahahahaha.

1- Don't use big words to look smart when you don't even understand clearly how to use them. Also, it doesn't go with your personality; you showed a lack of self-control with your words just because someone had a stronger argument than yours. If you get mad that easily don't even try to look cool, it clearly won't work.

Apologies I did not know a dictionary was out of reach of you. To transpose means to transfer two or more things to another or to change the place and context. It is synonymous with transfer, but given you are placing your own behaviors upon myself rather than a movement of an actual object or quality, transpose would be the most appropriate word. Similarly, this goes with your assumptions of character and emotional context. Holding anger against you because of your emotionally based view would be foolishness. I understand you are intimidated, but there is no need to be so passive aggressive.

2- I was never attacking people, I just called you biased.

"I get you guys like mages and are biased and won't accept reality; so proceed to live your own biased illusions."

That is an attack dude. When you state someone's views are biased and that they live in a false reality that is an attack against someone both in their character and as the motivation of their views. This is an ad hominem. To attack means to speak or act in a way which is meant to result in harm against another individual.

I was never obligating people to support me; I was giving my opinion about the matter. It just shows a low level of understanding.

Of course you were, because if you weren't, you would never have issued and attack, nor would you have been making these passive aggressive marks above. Have you never done any form of logical debating? Any theory crafting?

Now, enjoy yourself preparing whatever irrational argument or offenses that you have to say because after reading your last comment, I won't even bother in seeing it.

You are offering me the last word in an attempt to save face and protect your ego. Cute. I'll take it.

Banana muffin. Oops that was two words.