The conflicting arguments of the "break the meta" debate
"But Smite Support Nunu works. He's in DIamond ELO"
Alright so we agree that if a strategy works, its perfectly fine. We would also agree that using Smite Support Janna to perform the same strategy would not be acceptable because Janna can't actually clear the enemy jungle while counterjungling right?
So we're in agreeance that specific strategies and champions that can accomplish those specific strategies effectively to give your team an advantage is acceptable right? Smite Support Janna, however, should be reportable right?
#Thats literally exactly what a Meta is to begin with. Congrats on "not enforcing a meta".
"Support isn't a lane"
Alright so you're saying that since Riot didn't specifically name Support after a lane, they're free to do whatever? Let me ask you then. How is Riot forcing other people into specific lanes not ENFORCING A META? Why is it acceptable for Riot to undeniably enforce a meta on some positions but not others? Complete hypocrisy of the argument.
"It's ridiculous that he got banned after receiving reports in over half his games"
Who are you trying to kid? 99% of the community would be smashing that report button without an ounce of hesitation if he was on your team in a ranked game. I would dare to say he received reports in 100% of all games he lost. Please spare us your white-knighting keyboard activist bullshit. You know damn well you would be posting a thread here complaining "How do you carry these worthless trolls in ranked?!?!?! WHY DOES RIOT DO NOTHING?!?!?!"