The reason you should get rid of the surrender at 15.

AR URF·Aug 17, 2017·1 votes·372 views

Because there will always be that one guy who says no. The fact that one person will ruin it for the other 4 is just ridiculous. We all have a passion for this game and find it generally enjoyable, but we all suffer from the toxicity of the community. And because the community is toxic, there will always be that one guy to say no. hell there's always one guy out of 4 that will say shit like "report" or "?" or "GG EZ". I don't really recall having a game that the surrender went through.

5 Comments

NahuiAug 17, 20174 votes

I dislike surrender 15 because it essentially ends the game. Even if one says no, 4 people will often just give up and feed until 20. Between 15 and 20 mins there is so much potential for comebacks and morale boosts, but a 15 attempt can ruin that.

My opinion is never ff. Unless you're high ELO, the game is only decided when the nexus explodes. Both sides play so poorly that it's never a definitive lead on either.

LiteUpSketchersAug 17, 20171 votes

Don't you mean low elo?

Or did you actually mean high elo?

lilpokflufAug 17, 20171 votes

I think they're right, high elo players have less chance of throwing and giving away a lead. I've seen low elo players throw games all the time. Shit I probably did it last week lol

adorable supportAug 17, 20171 votes

{quoted}

I think they're right, high elo players have less chance of throwing and giving away a lead. I've seen low elo players throw games all the time. Shit I probably did it last week lol

not true, I see people throwing every single game in my games. when i'm watching streams of challenger players I also see people throwing every game. it's not an elo thing, it's honestly just something that happens everywhere. the difference i'd say is how well a team can deal with said throws -- you can either throw some more or you can play extremely passive, turtling until the enemy counter-counter throws.