My point from the start was that it's not a "hard counter" and that a skilled ahri can outplay an annie, not that annie is not a counter. You were so quick to be aggressive (and yes, it is trash talk when what you're saying IS NOT TRUE but just offensive) that you missed the point I was actually making. Someone else said that ahri was Annie's counter, I just said that it comes down to skill, because it's not a one sided battle like some match ups (for example, vel koz vs Zed)
The fact that you agree with my point by the end of your rant, shows that you are the one that doesn't know what you are talking about, because you are not even aware of the conversation topic. I don't claim to know everything, and I talk on these forums because sometimes you do learn something new, I have no problem being wrong, but you are, and definitely were being a dick, that has nothing to do with me being right or wrong, it's to do with your attitude and lack of patience for less experienced players sharing the thoughts on... what's this, a FORUM designed specifically for sharing thoughts and opinions. If it upsets you so much, stop reading them.
Referring to someone's rank as Wet Toilet paper, isn't hard cold truth, it's trash talk, pick up a dictionary if you can't take my word for it, and as for winrates, I don't claim to know everything about it, but i mention Galio because I know that he can thrash Anni 8/10 times even at my level of use (which I admit, went from Gold to Silver recently so again, I know I am not Plat or challenger knowledge) Ahri is a different matter, but winrates can only tell you so much, especially about unauthodox champs presence in Game, Galio is a good example of how your stat throwing, that I can neither confirm or argue against, doesn't translate to champ skill as much as player style. I know many Galio players that still haven't adapted items like Righteous Glory into his kit, or build Merc treads because on PAPER it is what he should have, because he's not a blasting mage like Ahri, Syndra, Anni etc, people often don't know how best to utilise him and therefore still lose because he is a rare practical pick that has easily exploited weaknesses (especially if you take the jungler into account). Whereas champs like Zed are far easier to analysis because their purpose and playstyle are more linear, and it's easier to determine a curve for match-ups
I believe in facts more than opinions, but I don't disregard opinions because of OTHER opinions. If you can prove your point, I'll back down, as I have done in other discussions, as I said, I come on here to learn, so being proven wrong is part of that process and I have no problem with it. But if you just start talking trash and interweave it with some arguable points, that you don't actually bother to push, then you haven't proven me wrong, you've just given another opinion, and the assumption of an opinion being fact is the true nature of arrogance, making your opinion return to being irrelevant.
4 flashes in one ability for 100 mana. Make her ranged. Give her HARD cc. Give her true damage. Make her HARD cc increase damage dealt. It's not fucking hard to land so shut the fuck up weebs. Have her 100 cost 4 flashes deal damage to 3 people and have them target people automatically.
damage. Cut his flash THAT COSTS A FUCK TON OF MANA in half. Oh yeah and he's melee. Let's make his only viable ability his E which is only up if you have some kind of spammy mage around you. Oh yeah and it wasn't hard CC either so it only made sense to cut the duration in half. And let's have him go oom after 1 and a half combos while he only takes 1/4 of your health.
"Balance is weakness" - Zed, head of Riot balance team
?
