ONLY 17 threads were boosted/worthy of attention for Gameplay+ out of Hundreds!

Fraggleroc·Aug 25, 2018·3 votes·1,282 views

Really, out of hundreds of threads on the board, u were only able to boost 17 through the moderated approval process of Gameplay+.

Most threads are not as detailed- that does not mean they don't raise relevant insight into Gameplay design etc.

I don't know but it seemed pretty insulting actually for those of us who do not have the time to flesh out what we wanted to say, but wanted to raise some points (we feel is important) for discussion on the boards.

9 Comments

Laughing FishAug 25, 20185 votes

Threads are not ascended from gameplay to gameplay+. Rather, you have to intentionally try to post on Gameplay+ and then get approved. So even if you wrote a brilliant work on gameplay, unless you submitted it to be on Gameplay+ it will not be posted there. So the fact there are good threads on gameplay still doesn't mean the gameplay+ system is too strict.

LegitBusinessmanAug 25, 20182 votes

Gameplay+ just sounds like damage control so new people will think the legitimate arguments about how awful the game state is are fringe opinions and not validated by the community.

Rock MDAug 25, 20183 votes

{quoted}

Gameplay+ just sounds like damage control so new people will think the legitimate arguments about how awful the game state is are fringe opinions and not validated by the community.

No it's for people who want discussion about the game.

People being the members who post a lot offering insights or questions and they get drowned out by people complaining about the game state.

It's a board for those players.

HotarµAug 25, 20182 votes

Most threads are not as detailed- that does not mean they don't raise relevant insight into Gameplay design etc.

I don't know but it seemed pretty insulting actually for those of us who do not have the time to flesh out what we wanted to say, but wanted to raise some points (we feel is important) for discussion on the boards.

That's the point of Gameplay+. To have detailed, intricate discussions on how to better the game and discuss valid points **instead ** of non-fleshed out arguments. Also, as others said, you don't just get lifted from Gameplay to Gameplay+ based on your post.

SugeMinPikkAug 25, 20182 votes

Can't have "detailed, intricate discussions" with silvers lmao it should be limited to diamonds or at least plats

HotarµAug 25, 20182 votes

Ok. That's subjective, just because someone is a lower rank doesn't mean what they have to say isn't valid.

For example, Yasuo may not be problematic in high elos but in low elos his ban rate is insanely high. Someone could post on Gameplay+ with reasonable points and talk about why he's not fun/fair to fight and then go from there. Alienating people based on the color of their border is never a good idea.

SugeMinPikkAug 25, 20181 votes

lol

HotarµAug 25, 20181 votes

Frosted TipsAug 25, 20181 votes

I agree I posted about how conqueror should be adaptive based on Riot's reason to want runes to change based on how you want to play but they found it to lack insight.