"Majority wins" in One-For-All is a bad rule.

SSShutTheDuckUp·Aug 5, 2016·7 votes·738 views

Well, title says it. The mode is fun, however the majority pick is beyond stupid. Even with 4-man voting for a champ and the 5-th man voting for another - there still should be 20% chance per vote

9 Comments

PermabannedGarenAug 6, 20162 votes

Are you really so delusional as to think that your one vote should count for as much as four other people?

Why should four people be forced to play something they don't want to play because of one guy?

Get some fucking friends if you want to play who you want.

SSShutTheDuckUpAug 6, 20161 votes

I am saying that if I vote for a champion, and other 4 vote for another I should have 20% chance to win the poll. having or not having friends is irrelevant to the current topic.

ZombiesbumAug 6, 20161 votes

Yup. It makes me sad every time I see stupid design choices like this. It's these dumb choices that has stopped me from paying money into this game. I'm already giving enough simply by playing.

You can suggest to "dodge" all day but I have used all dodges I can, the last one was a 30 min wait. All because of the shit system which favours premades. Just like dynamic queue. I see a pattern.

Why should I have to be at the mercy of a premade? It's not even about the champion at this point, it's about not having a choice as a solo player.

Fuck you rito .I.

SSShutTheDuckUpAug 6, 20161 votes

{quoted} It's not even about the champion at this point, it's about not having a choice as a solo player.

Exactly

ApexInTheCircleAug 6, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Awesomeasf ck,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=dVOmV5XH,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-08-06T16:07:14.127+0000)

Exactly

Riot has shown time and time again that they have no respect for solo players in this game. Hell I play mostly DQ now to avoid having a 4 man premade on my team or to counter the 4 man on the enemies.