3 blue bans, 2 red bans, 2 blue bans, 3 red bans

ModKnightsKemplar··4 votes·376 views

It's still faster than the current ban phase. I see no downside.

4 Comments

Irelia Bot2 votes

"No because some bullshit reason that really holds no merit" - a large part of the boards

ModKnightsKemplar1 votes

I don't get it. I also don't see those people, actually. I was thinking that most of us wanted it this way. Just trying to make sure we get heard.

Rewt2 votes

Massive strategic advantage goes to the Red team thanks to being able to hold onto their bans and wait till blue has used theirs since red gets their 3 bans after the blue team uses all 5.

It may seem like a good idea but you need to look at the strategic implications of having 3 bans after another team has used all 5 of theirs.

ModKnightsKemplar1 votes

In solo Q, at least as high as platinum, I rarely see anyone use ANY strategy with bans, frankly.

And yeah, even if there's an advantage with red side, that balances with blue side's pick advantage for first pick. I see your point, but I do not agree that the strategic implications are NEARLY as large as you suppose.

More from Gameplay

More by KnightsKemplar