FFS REMOVE THE SURRENDER OPTION ALREADY

Teh Song·Jul 30, 2016·1 votes·771 views

People need to play every goddamn match all the way through or not play LoL at all. The 2 most infuriating things I have ever encountered in gaming are when your team surrenders and when the enemy team surrenders. Play. The. God. Damn. Match. To. The. End. OR DON'T PLAY THE GAME AT ALL.

Guess what people, the vote isn't out of 5 people, it's out of 10. Just because you can't handle losing doesn't give you the right to rob your opponent of their victory.

You can kindly remove yourself from the gaming community if you ever hit that button in any game that has it.

At the very least it needs to be changed to have all 10 people vote on it, and require at least 8 of the votes.

Added: Wait, Better idea, add a special separate queue that removes the option.

10 Comments

TormentulaJul 30, 20167 votes

If there isn't a surrender vote, there will just be afks and people literally ignoring mid lane so it can be shoved.

Surrendering is just the not toxic method of moving on.

Communist ToastJul 30, 20163 votes

the vote is out of 10? I am sure the 5 people on the winning side don't care if you surrendered.

Raja ChachkiJul 30, 20163 votes

You aren't robbing your opponent of their victory lol what? They still get their IP, their champ mastery points. Are you only saying this because you were stomping a game and refused to end it, making the other team feel terrible and surrender? Then shame on you, I hate players who try to squeeze in those extra kills to boost their KDA.

And your solution, absolutely nonsensical. There are two scenarios here. 1. One team is stomping the other, and they try to surrender. The winning team denies them that, and proceeds to continue to kill them without trying to close out the game in order to get an "S" or whatever. The losing team is absolutely miserable. 2. One team is beating the other team by a few kills, maybe a drag and a turret due to one bad teamfight or one feeder, and the other team tries to surrender EVEN THOUGH they could absolutely win the game. The barely-winning team would agree to the surrender (to get an easy victory), and then basically get a free win because they influenced the other team by reinforcing the idea that the other team is hopeless.

Often, feeders in my games try to surrender even though we are winning because they aren't enjoying themselves, just because they aren't stomping. So we can say "no" to the surrender vote, and can carry the feeder to victory. With your proposed "solution", the enemy team will eagerly overpower the ones trying to carry the feeder and basically force them to surrender.

VoidStaresBackJul 30, 20163 votes

My policy on surrender votes is that I only surrender if my team has an AFK/DC that isn't coming back into the game. At that point, particularly if you get even remotely behind, it's pretty much impossible to come back from. Besides that, I usually try to play games out till the end because things can swing pretty majorly if you can hold out long enough.

Axe2HandleJul 30, 20162 votes

10/10 will laugh at OP again.

Teh SongJul 31, 20161 votes

Wait, Better idea, add a special separate queue that removes the option.

373danversJul 31, 20161 votes

lmao this guy.

Surr20plzJul 31, 20161 votes

Sperglord.

TheLazySunbroJul 31, 20161 votes

http://i.imgur.com/XEmo4.jpg This Guy lmao

XT FaiZyJan 13, 20191 votes

Hate when they surrender, i try to get s+ but they always surrender so i cant, how are we going to get it if they surrender when u have like 10-2 in stats, once i played talon i had 109 farm and after 15 min i had 163. but i still got a+ on him WTF and i was 5-1-3