Can we just disable WW

Junkο·Dec 9, 2014·3 votes·564 views

I know the patch is out tomorrow, but i'm seriously sick of losing ranked games just because somebody on the enemy team picked WW because our team captain rather banned Talon and Akali

4 Comments

Knight DevoutDec 9, 20141 votes

Warwick

Hunter's Call (W) duration reduced to 6 seconds from 10 seconds. Infinite Duress (R) total damage reduced to 150/250/350 damage from 250/335/420 Skirmisher's Sabre Challenging Smite tooltip now reads "While Marked, basic attacks deal true damage over 3 seconds..."

Should no longer be a problem.

JunkοDec 9, 20141 votes

Yes but i had people dodge 5 games in a row(once was me) because somebody on enemy team got WW. He is still free win till tomorrow morning.

Also i lost my 100% winrate with Rengar in ranked after 4 wins. Now i can boast to my friends :(

Drunk RummateDec 9, 20141 votes

WW isnt that bad if you pick janna or thresh and just peel off his ult

hell, you can even snag a mikaels. or black shield with morgana to deny him grabbing your AD.

the only thing that's really oppressive is his level 6 gank, and that's no worse than a level 6 Vi to be honest.

TerchioDec 9, 20141 votes

Warwick has an almost 5% higher win rate than anyone else. In other words: every other champion has between a 40.48% and a 54.31% win chance, a less than 14% spread over 121 champions, and the only other champion with over a 1% difference between themselves and the one above/below them is Kalista, just below the 2% mark, right at the bottom. Warwick nearly nabs 5% at the top (59.07%).

I think that's fairly broken, especially since there are 4 large nerfs coming his way this next patch (W, R, Challenging Smite, Devourer enchantment). Let's be honest, those two items were mostly abused by him, and all of those nerfs are quite enormous in size. I hardly think a quick disable is that tall an order. Should have been done earlier, and I've seen it done for smaller issues.