So I was just ddosed by the enemy xerath in a ranked game when we already had an afk.

Tentakill Myself·Apr 6, 2015·3 votes·480 views

This is legit getting retarded. 2 afks in a row and this game the enemy xerath goes out of his way to find my skype and ddos me over a game of League, when we already had an afk from the beginning.

I am astounded Riot has done jack shit to compensate for afks, and now because of Riot's slap-on-the-wrist punishments, ddosing is coming into the mix.

This game is getting to be nothing but pure cancer, and a pain in the ass to constantly deal with afks.

10 Comments

darkdillApr 6, 20152 votes

Wrong place to complain, man. Take your complaint to Riot Support.

Tentakill MyselfApr 6, 20151 votes

{quoted}

Wrong place to complain, man. Take your complaint to Riot Support.

They don't do anything. I sent a report a few months ago when someone was saying death threats in chat and that player hasnt received a punishment yet.

usul1202Apr 6, 20151 votes

The time and effort and skill needed to properly DDoS someone that you don't know ahead of time is way to large to reasonably do in a League of Legends game. You had crappy interwubz. it happens. pay comcast or whoever their hostage fee.

phirestarterApr 6, 20151 votes

I believe you. Riot is completely paralyzed and unable to do anything, their new hackers gone employee have advised them to do nothing, and that appears to be what they are doing, choosing instead to focus on who said a bad word or hurt someones feelings.

Meanwhile, hacks, scripts, and bots continue to slowly destroy ranked game integrity.

Here are a couple of automated bot players from my recent games:

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-history/NA1/49424875

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-history/NA1/215017168

usul1202Apr 7, 20151 votes

You do realize that hiring people that broke your product is something done by companies as small as riot to the government level right? The standard best way to fix a glitch and its similars is through the person who found it when others didn't. If they got hired from finding a glitch, they sure as hell didn't get hired to sit there and tell rito that nothing is wrong because they found it.

phirestarterApr 7, 20151 votes

So now you're going to have some endless dialogue with me about the benefits of hiring hackers to come work for you? Does that really form the basis of my argument? Or is it just a side issue I happened to throw in there?

usul1202Apr 7, 20151 votes

I was addressing what appeared to be the main point of your comment, that being that the people riot hired weren't doing anything. In fact, My point there is that I do believe they are countering the exploits as much as possible, as seen by the lack of recent bugs like the yorick ult+GA bug on release.

If your point was that the botters exist, how do you prepose stopping them? A report option? easily can be used to break the game, especially with 3-4 man pre-mades. With no tribunal it's very difficult for a company of Riot's size to control a player base of their size.

phirestarterApr 7, 20151 votes

no. that was not the main point.

usul1202Apr 7, 20151 votes

Your comments, separately:

{quoted}

I believe you. Riot is completely paralyzed and unable to do anything,

I directly responded to that.

{quoted}

their new hackers gone employee have advised them to do nothing, and that appears to be what they are doing

I responded to that in the same way.

{quoted}

choosing instead to focus on who said a bad word or hurt someones feelings.

a supporting clause as to empower the previous statement. no need for a response.

{quoted}

Meanwhile, hacks, scripts, and bots continue to slowly destroy ranked game integrity.

I responded to this in my second answer.

Here are a couple of automated bot players from my recent games:

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-history/NA1/49424875

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-history/NA1/215017168

Supporting evidence from the previous section, no need for a direct response.

I am clearly not smart enough to read into a point on my own. Mind clarifying what you intended?