why isnt trydemeres ult nerfed (logic sense here)

xDogMeatx··4 votes·1,513 views

if we take away 30 points of ad per 500 excess damage during undying rage till its over (adding in a reason to further cc him) so that he doesnt need a 1v5 the whole team and survive where is the logic that he gets to keep his damage. im pretty sure no matter my willpower to live or anger to fight im pretty sure its not gonna be possible if i have shredded/burned/frostbitten/eaten muscles.

18 Comments

Padoµch4 votes

Ohh look another barelly Silver player complaining about Tryndamere, the champion that has tuns of counterplay, but hey.. Just pick Malphite, max E, take thornmail and frozen heart + Ninja Tabi, build iceborn gauntlet and ninja tabi. BAM use E, his attackspeed drops to like 0.37 and he is done. He cannot trade with you anymore....

UlyssesISR1 votes

{quoted}

Ohh look another barelly Silver player complaining about Tryndamere, the champion that has tuns of counterplay

He least he knows how to spell simple words...

xDogMeatx1 votes

counterpicking isnt the problem its logic thats the issue your telling me if someone had their body burned up shot up they can use willpower to basically overcome it? yeah thats not a human thing unless hes part darkin or something or nano machines

Jamaree3 votes

Because without it, he would be pretty shit tbh.

ShroomLord6452 votes

Sounds like a perfect reason for a rework then when an uninteractive skilless ability is the only thing keeping a champion afloat.

Jamaree2 votes

{quoted}

Sounds like a perfect reason for a rework then when an uninteractive skilless ability is the only thing keeping a champion afloat.

Fair, but that is the reason why it isn't nerfed.

xDogMeatx1 votes

yeahhhh i dont see it key word here i used is "if 500 excess damage to hp during undying rage" which is alot of value for trading ad for immortality its also more logical.

Jamaree1 votes

{quoted}

yeahhhh i dont see it key word here i used is "if 500 excess damage to hp during undying rage" which is alot of value for trading ad for immortality its also more logical.

I don't know what you are talking about 500 excess damage, what and where did you even get this number?

xDogMeatx1 votes

its sounds right if anything else your telling me its better he gets immortallity without any cost to himself in any way 500 is a tanky number enough to justify losing 30 ad per 500. instead of just simply accepting that he cant die. if he cant die then whats the point in ccing him if your better off killing off the enemy team while playing run away from him. theres no incentive to cc him only displace is king vs him. your also telling me that a mere battle barbarian warlord has the power to defy being shredded to death and pelted with bullets and disintigrated at the same time but still live? does that make logical sense enough??? im pretty sure willpower does not nullify biology unless hes using hextech nano-machines then i would understand.

6KEMBE4ORBA2 votes

Low elo complaining about trynd :D :D :D

nice one xD

I laughed

xDogMeatx2 votes

elo shaming shouldnt be a thing no comment has more value then another. so your telling me that its logical that hes allowed to do damage while immortal? I personally can lane vs him its just that he needs a counterable measure instead of just running away.

6KEMBE4ORBA1 votes

I mean, like the majority of trynda complains come from people below low plat and that's pretty funny.

Just stating a fact. Not elo shaming. :D

xDogMeatx1 votes

oh ok but still though i hate immortality. (logic wise) i would be ok if aatrox (old one) had it because hes darken/basically a war god and they are immortal beings so it fits their lore but tryndamere is a human possibly the strongest since hes their leader but i doubt immortality fits his theme but again its not the ult i hate its the logic how its carried out. it should be reserved for "hard to kill" cosmic beings.

Sasogwa1 votes

{quoted}

oh ok but still though i hate immortality. (logic wise) i would be ok if aatrox (old one) had it because hes darken/basically a war god and they are immortal beings so it fits their lore but tryndamere is a human possibly the strongest since hes their leader but i doubt immortality fits his theme but again its not the ult i hate its the logic how its carried out. it should be reserved for "hard to kill" cosmic beings.

You're talking logic sense in a fucking medieval fantastic world where it's perfectly fine for a berserker barbarian to ignore his wounds and keep fighting until he dies.

xDogMeatx1 votes

well put it like that well... im stumped XD even i have a vivid imagination i can see that.

Sona Ping1 votes

{quoted}

yeahhhh i dont see it key word here i used is "if 500 excess damage to hp during undying rage" which is alot of value for trading ad for immortality its also more logical.

{quoted}

its sounds right if anything else your telling me its better he gets immortallity without any cost to himself in any way 500 is a tanky number enough to justify losing 30 ad per 500. instead of just simply accepting that he cant die. if he cant die then whats the point in ccing him if your better off killing off the enemy team while playing run away from him. theres no incentive to cc him only displace is king vs him. your also telling me that a mere battle barbarian warlord has the power to defy being shredded to death and pelted with bullets and disintigrated at the same time but still live? does that make logical sense enough??? im pretty sure willpower does not nullify biology unless hes using hextech nano-machines then i would understand.

That's not "logic". You choosing not to be willing to accept the premise of the game is not a reason to nerf a character in it and the proposed change in response to that, that is not logical.

xDogMeatx1 votes

well enlighten me why is he immortal if hes a human?

MLDzXnRRR1 votes

Trynda's kit very bad outside of the R. I guess the spin and the crit passive are OK, but nothing exciting.

More from Gameplay

More by xDogMeatx