If characters aren't meant to be forced into certrain roles, where else are these guys meant to go?

Braum can also tank-ish top with a Wits end vs AP or Botrk vs AD into a Titanic Hydra into full tank. Honestly the only position I will play him. Manfighting Olafs is too fun.

Leo can definitely Jungle, although her clear isn't wonderful right now. With a Taric/Alistar bot though you can run a CC kill lane and go for early snowball wins with plenty of tower dive. IBG's are fun.

Thresh gonna have some fun as an ADC with stormrazor, AS Thresh with rageblade can get VERY amusing once he has enough souls, since each soul grants 1 damage on hit + flat AP which he does on hit via rageblade. Only seen it once, but the guy managed to farm to late game, wasn't even fed, and wiped out 3 people, 1 of them a fairly fed Fiora, by excessive flailing. Easily one of the most amusing things I have seen, although definitely not as viable as a one shot Thresh build unless you get to freefarm all game.

I used to play a ton of AP Alistar Jungle/mid before his minor changes. Not a fan of his E/passive switch for jungling so I'm not really sure how he fares now.

Bard can AP mid but also has a surprisingly good jg clear, especially once he gets AOE chimes. His ganks require landing Q, but tbf that really isn't any harder than Reksai ganks, and they are actually very similar due to sneaky pathing.

Ivern definitely has the short end of the straw here, but I have seen a couple amusing top lane Iverns. You have to pick into a tank or other passive enemy, but you can constantly poke via bushes and end up following a similar build to the mid lane Lulu strat.

Personally don't play him, but my friend used to play a lot of Skarner support. Passive lane until 6 but then it is free kills when your jungler ganks. Ends up going for an ultimate hat + movespeed build, forcing QSS's on all the enemy carries, while his ult is on a much shorter CD than QSS. Combined with a pick/siege comp and you just keep the enemies in their base until Skarner is able to grab a priority target who's QSS is down. With enough movespeed the enemys can't collapse before your team has taken them down, in which case they are in a 4v5 and down one of their top 2 players, while we have only used our support's ult/items.

Definitely not the strongest strat, but a fun one that works up until around low gold fairly consistently. Definitely struggles while behind though, but you can say that for a lot of champions in their best positions, let a below average champion in an unusual position.

to be fair there was a time in season freaking 4/5 when people called top lane "the place where mid lane rejects go" because Lulu and Ryze were dominating up there (and the other example was vlad even though he wasn't a new to top lane).

Ok so you want top Lulu to be a thing again? That won't go over well with the boards seeing how they're seemingly 90% top mains.

I agree with this. We're frequently told that Riot wants more diversity in the game, and wants more champions to be viable in more positions, but when it comes to actually making said champions viable and healthy in more than one position, the typical response we've got is that it's simply easier to balance a champion around just one lane. There's always been this kind of clash between diversity and convenience of balancing, and so far the latter has won out, in part because we still don't really have a system in place for allowing champions to be viable in multiple positions. It also doesn't help that certain champions were designed with only one role in mind, and have had their kits so focused around said role that they become unhealthy if played even slightly differently (e.g. Lulu when taken top). It might take a while before we truly start seeing diversity in League, and before that happens we may need a more reliable balancing methodology that would make the process stabler and more predictable.

{quoted}

Riot likes to state that they don't "force" meta or champions to go into certain roles, but their patterns of balance obviously say otherwise. Any time a champion is doing well in a non-intended role, we see it nerfed to the ground.

That's because most of the time when champions go into roles/lanes they weren't meant for, they tend to be rather oppressive or just horribly imbalanced.

There are certain exceptions like Support Trundle/Miss Fortune.

Also if riot hated champions going to roles they weren't meant for, a lot of mages wouldn't be able to support at all. Though, the more I think about it, Riot tends to be ok with champions going into the support role (bar Malzahar support) than anywhere else.

Played jungle, don't recommend, his clear times and health after rotation is terrible.

A big point of the mid mage nerfs was to open up the lane to other classes/roles. Of course this got people talking about marksmen bot lane, and supports. The listed supports have no business being anywhere than where they were designed to be. Unlike marksmen who could go anywhere (not all everywhere, but enough of them can fill any lane/role). I think this is a troll-ish post about how is Riot going to fit these champs into different roles.

For all the people suggesting Leona specifically for top and jungle, how could she contend? She can't proc her passive on her own, even against minions or monsters, and that's where most of her trading power comes from.