Kill Contribution should not be a factor for Mastery Rating

If you aren't getting S's that's you lol. Few/no kills does not prevent it.

{quoted}

If I take less kills than other people on Janna or Soraka, that should not prevent me from getting the best grades because kills are not what Janna or Soraka is supposed to do to begin with. I rest my case.

The problem is the system expects u to participate in every fight if u noticed... to get a better chance at S+. That is not realistic for splitpushers who have a low KDA and kill contribution.

U're not being compared based on your role- that system isn't in yet.

....

...

This has been in the entire time. Please read the Mastery announcement and FAQ; it has been explained many times by Riot already.

The Riot system is able to determine in-game or post-game where you played (i.e. your position, more precisely than your role), and you are compared with other players that used the same champion AND at the same position. Lulu bots are compared to other Lulu bots, not with Lulu mid. That's what Deep Terror Nami meant, and it works like that even in Blind Pick where the positions are not assigned officially pre-game.

{quoted}

for me what's cool is the idea of having an actual representation of my skill on a champion. i can be like hey i got this and this mastery on this and this champion, and instantly my friends would know hey, this guys good at those champions For example, i got 300k Mastery points on wukong, that is by no means a representation of my skill on Wukong. i just wish that's how the system worked

Maybe tweak the system so you can lose points for poor play. Maybe take your stats you get in-game and cross-check it with every other wukong in your division and give you a rating in comparison.

Obviously for poor play you'd lose points meaning keeping the highest rating..actually means something. and obviously as you climb elo, divisions become better meaning it'll be harder to actually stay at the top.

i use wukong as an example. idk, right now the whole system is just so meaningless...

I'd rather they have a simpler system which is based entirely on Number of Games Played only... although it becomes a grind. The current system is skewed towards teamfighters and only one way to win the game. We know that isn't true at all.

Well, that's much more constructive than your initial comment.

I mostly agree, but I think your suggestion is quite complex. Maybe a similar but simpler solution would be to simply get the average of your X previous game on a champion, so if you consistently get S and A, you'll have a high rating, but you won't if you just play a crapton of games and always get C.