I'm so sick of Riot's bias with certain champions
And you all know what I'm talking about. How certain champions are always intentionally kept viable or strong. How some champions, despite ridiculous playrate or winrate (and sometimes both) are let off scott free while others are kneecapped the moment they become strong.
Ahri and Lux have had a dumb as hell win rate and play rate for well over a year and yet get nothing (and no that little change to ahri that affects like 2 or 3 matchups doesn't count.) Lee sin get's buffed not because he's weak, but because for once in his lifetime he wasn't a dominant meta shifting champion like he usually is (and than of course of top of the buff, all the champions above him get nerfed as well).
It honestly pisses me off how there's blatant favourtism to certain champions. DFT too strong on release? Well we will nerf it as well as brand, malzahar, swain, and karthus. Champion who were finally strong for the first time in years were immediately nerfed the moment they had a good winrate. Meanwhile ahri and lux get the same winrate, higher playrate, and get played in the lcs.
Tell me outside of liking a champions kit/playstyle, I should play someone who isn't one of your favourite stars. On a competitive level, why would I bother learning new champions. I can just main these champions and never have to worry about being out of the meta. Never have to pick based on the current patch, or meta changes, or matchups. Just insta lock that lux/ahri/lee/etc and enjoy the win.