Stop using "skill cap" as an argument if you're going to quote Plat+ data
You can kick and scream all you want but Plat+ players are the top 10% of players. You cant say champ shouldnt have a 50% winrate "because they're supposed require skill" then quote statistics from the people who (on average) are going to have better mechanics and more experience than literally 90% of the entire playerbase. How does that make any sense? If you were talking about the most extreme skill floor/ceiling champs like
or something then fine, Plat players arent good enough to use them. But stop using it on champs like
etc etc that actually do require decent mechanics.
The typical argument looks like this. "Lee Sin shouldnt have a 50% WR because he has a high skill cap. (Proceeds to quote op.gg info)". So your argument is that they require skill and your proof is that they do mediocre among the most skilled sample of players? U w0t? How does that make any sense what-so-ever?