I'm not a fan of Feast-or-Famine Champs.
Champs like
(I'm gonna leave out Akali, since I haven't see her in quite the while)
They are aggressively played, mainly for the purpose of getting ahead. Now I know what you're thinking "Of course I want to get ahead, Duh" but these champs are inherently forced into an aggressive play style, just to be considered part of the game.
These champs can't just play passive, to what I have seen, others may have seen different, because early game is what makes or breaks them. They have to get ahead to stay relevant, and when they do, they start to seem oppressive.
Being forced into an aggressive role, makes hard counters worse for these champs, since their main strategy is going all out on yo ass, trying to get ahead. This can make games feel like they've already been lost, since they just picked a better champ.
I get that their kits force this role upon them, but I don't think it's a healthy relationship between the champ and the player.
and
I play passive and focus on CS and roams. I believe what you are suggesting is specific to one champ Fiora? and even she can farm and be fine in 1v1 mid game, she isn't an impactful 5v5/3v3 champ IMO unless super fed, because of her kit, it is suited for 1v1s almost exclusively (makes sense since she is the GRAND DUELIST). Mostly I see newer/inexperienced players who feel forced to play a champ a certain way, if so that champ probably doesn't fit your playstyle and you should look for a better match
.

