How is mobility creep worse than utility creep

Big Lincoln··5 votes·356 views

Give a champion a dash or two and everyone comes out of the woodwork parroting MOBILITY CREEP LUL. doesn't matter if the mobility is accounted for in their power budget, doesn't matter if the mobility is conditional, we'll bitch about mobility creep

Meanwhile nobody bats an eye at HOW MUCH utility supports and tanks are getting. We're fine with Ivern Lulu Janna Karma permashielding teammates? We're fine with item 3504 giving defensive spells an extra offensive steroid? It's okay that Sejuani Zac Galio + most new supports can chain-CC you indefinitely by themselves? item 3109 basically giving your teammate 12% damage reduction for doing nothing but standing near you, item 3174 adding enormous heals to AP supports who already have one, this is all fine and dandy?

This is the least fun meta I've ever had to play in. With just a handful of support items you can basically make your entire team, and ESPECIALLY your carry, invincible -- almost purely off of your item actives and spamming your shield button. But at least they're not mobile, right?

2 Comments

agbudar1 votes

a shield can be broken, but something thats not there anymore can not be hit. no amounts of mitigation will block damage fully(damage is often paired with high mobility champions). chain CC is the ONLY counter to mobility.

Big Lincoln1 votes

chain CC is the ONLY counter to mobility.

Poppy Veigar stop dashes, Cassiopeia grounding prevents mobility from starting.

point click damage doesn't care about mobility either

Chain CC dicks immobile champions more than it will ever harm mobile champions

More from Gameplay

More by Big Lincoln