My 16/0/10 mid laner who hard carried didn't even get S-

The Deckowner··2 votes·352 views

This grading system is straight up bs.

10 Comments

meowwow73 votes

it also looks for cs which you left out

The Deckowner1 votes

Which is the whole problem. why is CS weighted so much more than everything else?

Nautoday4 votes

Because CS is just as important as kills.

The Deckowner2 votes

Sharing farm for proper gold distribution is a legit strategy.

Nautoday1 votes

He had the lowest CS/m for a laner out of both teams. And the other laners were at the same rate on both teams.

Who is Taliyah1 votes

Because CS is the main source for gold income in this game.

Getting gold from csing is safer than getting kills.

Yes your midlaner had an amazing KDA, but it could have gone other way.

FEEDlNG TIME1 votes

Probably some stupid reason like they didn't meet the CS requirement. But yes I agree it's a flawed system.

LaughingStapler1 votes

It's not meant to be taken seriously.

Succeedsawce1 votes

221 cs at 41 minutes for a VIKTOR is beyond trash.

Why is it so difficult for people to understand that you're graded on things like GPM, objective participation, damage, and ward control... NOT FREAKING KDA.

The system isn't flawed, it grades you on precisely what it takes to >>>consistently<<< win and more specifically climb. Not just "kda carry" one game. It's a good system.

If you or him can't figure this out, neither of you ever deserves an S. Or to ever make it out of gold.

The Deckowner1 votes

He was 1v4 defending mid lane and staling out for 20 minutes so the team could get back into the game, as well as gifting cs to our adc who was severely behind. He has second highest gold income in game, most damage dealt to champions and second highest kill participation. You just looked at the low cs number and ignored everything else, taling stuff out of context. Why does CS matter when you still have second highest gold income?

More from Gameplay

More by The Deckowner