My 16/0/10 mid laner who hard carried didn't even get S-
This grading system is straight up bs.
This grading system is straight up bs.
it also looks for cs which you left out
Which is the whole problem. why is CS weighted so much more than everything else?
Because CS is just as important as kills.
Sharing farm for proper gold distribution is a legit strategy.
He had the lowest CS/m for a laner out of both teams. And the other laners were at the same rate on both teams.
Because CS is the main source for gold income in this game.
Getting gold from csing is safer than getting kills.
Yes your midlaner had an amazing KDA, but it could have gone other way.
Probably some stupid reason like they didn't meet the CS requirement. But yes I agree it's a flawed system.
It's not meant to be taken seriously.
221 cs at 41 minutes for a VIKTOR is beyond trash.
Why is it so difficult for people to understand that you're graded on things like GPM, objective participation, damage, and ward control... NOT FREAKING KDA.
The system isn't flawed, it grades you on precisely what it takes to >>>consistently<<< win and more specifically climb. Not just "kda carry" one game. It's a good system.
If you or him can't figure this out, neither of you ever deserves an S. Or to ever make it out of gold.
He was 1v4 defending mid lane and staling out for 20 minutes so the team could get back into the game, as well as gifting cs to our adc who was severely behind. He has second highest gold income in game, most damage dealt to champions and second highest kill participation. You just looked at the low cs number and ignored everything else, taling stuff out of context. Why does CS matter when you still have second highest gold income?