http://i.imgur.com/ULbENr3.png
I know grades are based on comparisons with the rest of the people who play the champ. That's also what this comparison does. Is this just a "Third parties aren't representative..." type thing? Because when I saw "A" for this Lucian game, it didn't make much sense, especially with how much weight is seemingly put on CS.
macromite1 votesthird party thing.
the actual is based on a mix of kda, cs, game duration, and other misc herbs and spices that I can't fathom, as well as having a role to character relation.
Edit. Forgot wards, that's part of it.
PhDs Nuts1 votesthird party thing.
the actual is based on a mix of kda, cs, game duration, and other misc herbs and spices that I can't fathom, as well as having a role to character relation.
Duration is typically just for CS though, isn't it? 9.0 KDA, 10 cs/minute wouldn't lower the ranking. I had the same wards/minute in the 'S' Trundle game as well.
macromite1 votesduration has to deal with the whole package. if it's a 40 minute game and you're kda is 1:0:1, that will hurt your score. high cs scores balance it out of course, so don't let it stop you from farming if that's what it takes.
sheldonbunny1 voteshttp://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/2204625887?tab=stats
You had less than 50% team kill participation. Your cs was good, you definitely could have warded more. Biggest issue is likely the participation. And as always, the disclaimer: You are compared to other Lucians in the marksmen role, not other champions.
