Riot Lyte on ask fm

Joe Dredd·Nov 18, 2015·1 votes·807 views

Would you at least acknowledge that 4-man premade surrender forcing is a potential issue? #LeagueOfLegends

We're definitely aware that it's a potential issue in Dynamic Queues, and if Premade 4s are dominating Surrender Votes too often, we can just make that particular situation require all 5 votes to trigger a surrender.

Are you fucking serious? So in the case that four people don't want to play anymore one person can hold them in a game? You better fucking believe that if me and my friends get in four man queues and you change it to 5 vote surrender we are just gonna afk in base And I'll get fuckin banned before i stop doin that shit

6 Comments

ImNotTicklshNov 18, 20152 votes

I seriously would hope you get permabanned for that. If you are in a 4 man premade and are losing so heavily you are wanting to surrender, please don't plague the queue with your 3 shitty friends.

Obviously permabanned is an exaggeration, but seriously just because you and your friends go on tilt in skype should not allow you complete control of the game. And imagine if it were just 4 trolls, they could just ff if they're winning and force a loss. If you already have 4 votes in your pocket you should be required to get that last vote as well, because in reality that would just mean you need ONE person to agree with you.

Joe DreddNov 18, 20151 votes

If you are in a 4 man premade and are losing so heavily you are wanting to surrender, please don't plague the queue with your 3 shitty friends.

wtf are you even trying to say here

but seriously just because you and your friends go on tilt in skype should not allow you complete control of the game

one for all gave complete control over champ select.

And imagine if it were just 4 trolls, they could just ff if they're winning and force a loss.

This game isn't balanced around trolls, if it was champions like bard/kalista/tahm kench wouldnt exist. Also if you have four trolls on your team and they want to lose then you will lose REGARDLESS of the surrender vote passing. The outcome is the exact same.

If you already have 4 votes in your pocket you should be required to get that last vote as well, because in reality that would just mean you need ONE person to agree with you.

I don't force my friends to surrender. If I start a ff vote I'm not gonna be yelling at them to surrender.

ImNotTicklshNov 18, 20151 votes

Saying that if you are in a 4 man premade you should not be losing horribly enough to need to surrender, if you are, stop queuing with your friends they are obviously trash.
Because they balance the game based off of game modes like urf and one for all.
Yes I get this, but sometimes you have trolls that will ff right when you are about to destroy the enemy nexus, which is much more frustrating than feeding the whole game.
If you have 4 people in skype and one of you has given up and wants to /ff you will almost definitely be on tilt and they will follow suit.

Honestly I just all around hate the idea of this queuing with multiple people idea altogether.

Joe DreddNov 18, 20151 votes

People have bad games. And the enemy can be premade too.
I wouldn't consider this a situation of balance. This is a situation on riots majority policy.
Once again the game isn't balanced around trolls. It doesn't fucking matter if this happens in 1/1000000 games. The games where it does help far outweighs to negative
Not even.

warpenguin555Nov 18, 20151 votes

How do you know that the 5 for a surrender wont be exclusive to a 4 man? (nah it probably wont, but its not confirmed yet)

Joe DreddNov 18, 20151 votes

It's still ridiculous though.

In one for all they made 3 people picking one thing guaranteed to be picked. A simple majority. You could have 4 man premades in one for all and get what you wanted every single game, and fuck that last guy. But ff votes, oh shit no man, we cant have that being a majority fuck these four people instead of saying fuck this one guy