Swapping Runeglaive's damage to physical was antipropedeutic in regards of spell/on-hit effects

Photos of Ghosts··1 votes·334 views

People still don't understand that abilities are divided in spells, buffs, on-hits and autoattack replacers. Changing its damage to physical right when you bugfixed the Luden proc means that now people are conforted in their ridiculous thought that any magic damage thing scales with AP and procs Luden's while any physical damage thing scales with AD and procs BotRK.

6 Comments

EndlessSorcerer3 votes

They didn't swap Runeglaive to physical damage. They made it no longer convert the basic attack's damage to magic damage.

Anyways, that sounds more like a player knowledge issue. If they can't be bothered to actually look up item and skill interactions, then that is an issue on their end.

Photos of Ghosts1 votes

Sure, it is an issue on player end (and it's not about "Looking up", it's about downright refusing to use logic on things you're told) but it needs to be corrected, and Riot instead did the action that could make them think they were right. Also why am I being downvoted rofl.

Dryditch2 votes

Everyone else focusing on the actual text, and I'm just sitting here wondering wtf antipropedeutic is supposed to mean.

Photos of Ghosts1 votes

Anti -> against pro -> for paidia/pedia -> kids eu -> good (t) ic -> "about" Antieducative, is this better?

Dryditch2 votes

Neither one of those is an actual word.

Photos of Ghosts1 votes

Neither of antipropedeutic and antieducative? Please think by logical boxes. Propedeutic and educative both exist, so if you add any prefix or suffix that carries a meaning you have at the end a real word with a real meaning. That's how language works. Logic, not just mindlessly learning by heart.

More from Gameplay

More by Photos of Ghosts