Solution to the URF vs ARURF debate

fuffychan·Feb 25, 2017·2 votes·659 views

Complaints about ARURF come about because people can get stuck playing champions they dont want to, or matchups are decided at champ select while they were powerless to choose. Complaints about URF come about because people spam the same etc which is not only unfun to play against, but forces you to pick a stronger URF champ to have a chance to compete aka have fun.

My proposed solution: **URF is brought back. However, using a champion in URF disables further use of that champion. This applies up to TEN times. After use of at least ten different champions, the first champion you played becomes 'unlocked' again, and so on. **

Ten was chosen for new players who only have access to free week champions. This would guarantee champion diversity, while still allowing players the right to choose.

7 Comments

Dominick DestineFeb 25, 20173 votes

URF was never meant to be balanced.

I can't believe I have to say this....

fuffychanFeb 25, 20171 votes

Im actually in this camp. I loved URF and hated ARURF, but I tried to take some of the other sides considerations into account and came up with this plan, that really wouldnt change how I played anyway. For some reason it doesnt seem like Riot will give us regular URF again so at least this way we can choose.

Cant believe last ARURF I played like 50 games and never got Shaco my most played champion. Its stupid.

RozencrantzeFeb 25, 20173 votes

I played whatever champ I wanted. I didn't play the same ones over and over. I liked being able to choose, though. First round I tried I got Leona. I don't wanna play it anymore. URF was fun. ARURF kinda sucks. If I wanted all random i'd play ARAM.

fuffychanFeb 25, 20171 votes

I actually did this too. I would try champs like Ahri that I wouldnt see and have fun but it did get annoying going vs Fizz EVERY game. This way still lets you choose while still improving diversity without being restrictive.

RozencrantzeFeb 25, 20172 votes

I just gave it another chance. The LB and Blitz had never played the champs they were on. I own champs I have never played. I got them with bundles. I got a champion I love playing. We lost because half the team had no idea how to play the champs they were on. The chances of this happening would be so much lower if people could pick their champions.

Titanium70Feb 25, 20171 votes

No, now let me explain you why.

Your solution wont do any good for anyone. BOTH parties would suffer. Those wanting to play the precious OPs would QQ because of the 10 penalty, Those who want see some variation would also QQ because it'd still be Zed, Fizz, Riven every game.

This would not make ANYONE happy.