Ww, an "easy to play" champ, is at 51% winrate atm, while "high skill" jungler sit at 54% (ex.Shaco)

Tundra Hunter·8/22/2018, 1:40:13 AM·6 votes·2,059 views

Now, I wouldn't say I agree that Shaco is hard and Warwick is easy. But Riot logic is "Balanced easy champion should have a high winrate, Balanced hard champions should have a low winrate". And this isn't the case. Stats from https://champion.gg/statistics/#?sortBy=general.winPercent&order=descend&roleSort=Jungle

maybe it means Shaco is easy to play and Ww isn't so easy? =) <3 Shaco main downvote incoming

6 Comments

Hayaishi8/22/2018, 1:42:10 AM4 votes

Shaco cheeses the game way too hard i'm surprised he isn't at 70% wr.

Hyquiem8/22/2018, 1:54:37 AM1 votes

Winrates don’t mean anything so using them as evidence is invalid. Secondly shaco majorly sits at 54% since his one tricks. So to classify as easy champs having 50 or 50+ winrates is just b/c the majority if the player base plays the champs.

Now for a clear example, Take Azir, if he was “meta” again then his winrate would high and mighty, why b/c everyone who wants to climb would insta pick azir. Since the champ he is that can Ben played safe and thus easily win games he would be abused by a majority of the player base. But if he was nerfed he would be back to what he is now. Since no one would play him.

MrFawknSunshine8/22/2018, 2:14:42 AM1 votes

i wish the shaco in my last game was more skilled. he got out farmed, ganked, out map control, out dragon , out carry, damaged, kill by a shyvanna. to the point she was so fed we lost all outer turrets before 20mins. and me as tank maokai top had the most damage to champs on team.

we ff @ 20 GO SHACO!!!