@Gameplay team, how did our Karma feedback contribute to your thought processes?

Evenstar·Jun 3, 2016·4 votes·776 views

Ranging from day 1 of her rework until yesterday, where the subclass list was published out to the threads. In all seriousness, what has the team learned about Karma as a champion in the game?

What I've observed so far/and still observing...

There is a lack of consensus in class categorization among team member i.e.: Stattik has his own vision of creating a role for Karma to be Enchanter/Artillery Mage, others (like Meddler) thinks Battle Mage/Enchanter for her, while some others probably have different opinions too.

The usual "We'd love which direction the players want to take her" is still out there.

So, my question is, how did our information contribute to your knowledge of Karma? Because everything still feels one-dimensional and unproductive at best. How does us responding to your team, help you move forward when looking at Karma's case?

2 Comments

IxtaliKingJun 3, 20163 votes

Looked like most people were saying Battle mage/Enchanter, which makes sense because that's what she always was. I've noticed that riot seems to get caught between what a champ is meant to be and how they are played, for example; Eve is meant to be an assassin but she's played like a diver. Same thing with Karma, she was reworked to be a mage with a supportive element in her kit like Ori and Morg but she's played like a support. Before her mantras were homogenised in 5.10 she had the bare bones of a solid Battle Mage/Enchanter, and I've always felt that's something that should have been expanded upon because it was unique.