What's more annoying a flamer or a feeder?

AR URF··2 votes·396 views

A flamer because they can't see their own shortcomings and blame others.

6 Comments

Leylania4 votes

Both are annoying but if I had to decide I would rather take the flamer over the feeder. You can mute the flamer but you can't really prevent the feeder from ruining the game.

DariusDemiurge2 votes

A flamer don't cost you games as often.

Lauchmelder1 votes

I get more flamers than feeders, that logic doesn't add up.

Zero Drive2 votes

Definitely a flamer. A feeder loses value the more he dies and often times can be used as a target (people never ignore the 0/8 Ashe even when a 12/0 Akali is bashing their face in) to distract from more valuable players. When you carry a feeder they're usually thankful (unless they were inting) and you score some honor. When I get some toxic manchild in my game flaming his support/jungler/toplane, as though the more he flames the better that player will be, I feel like losing the game just so that guy loses LP. I know I can carry myself in the next game, but I don't want to carry a douche.

1337 h4x0r babe2 votes

feeder. the mute button exists. use it. You can't mute your teammate into stopping feeding.

Rockm Sockm1 votes

They are usually both

More from Gameplay

More by AR URF