Complaining about Ekko but Not Ahri?
i mean...she has everything that he has but she is ranged and has better sustain and slightly more mobility + true damage + better aoe damage. Why doesn't anyone complain about her?
i mean...she has everything that he has but she is ranged and has better sustain and slightly more mobility + true damage + better aoe damage. Why doesn't anyone complain about her?
down vote and move on
Why are you comparing Ekko and Ahri?
she has everything he has
...no. She doesn't.
In all honesty, OP's right. Ahri's been a very safe and a very strong pick for the longest time now, with a very high pick rate and a very solid win rate too. If anything, they need to tone her down.
She doesn't have a reset button.
Why do you think Zed and Leblanc were such big problems on the board?
http://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=CrestKnight
ahri is very strong.
she isn't over the top because she is skill shot based and really needs to dive to get her R and W damages to proc. however i think the Q movement speed gives the skill too much and that should be reverted.
her R CD is fairly short, its like 60~70seconds or something ridiculous when i have my morellos done (first item)
however i do find myself using the ult to get out because i was warding things i probably shouldn't have been warding, and then i often lack it in a team fight.
ekko on the other hand, AoE 2second stun, and ofc a 1.3AP AoE ultimate. ekko is crazy stupid in his numbers.
there si a bigger change they lose vs ahri then vs ekko but they would cry about ekko even if he had 35% win rate
actually, ekko has more cc, more mobility, more defense, and faster burst