[{quoted}](name=Von Brohenheim,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Ie3b1zV9,comment-id=000600000000,timestamp=2019-01-02T19:34:22.974+0000)
No, saying "Top is auto ganked at level 2. So they have little to no say in the game." is like saying “oh 88% winrate kassadin was balanced, you just have to kill him.”
You're moving the goalposts and then changing the subject to bot lane.
Also, if ganks are such low risk-high reward choices, your example blue side jungler is an idiot for not ganking mid while red side ganks top. "Forced" to invade? Who's forcing them, the extreme claim you're struggling to make?
What do you mean who’s forcing them? The enemy jungler and top laner are. Because after the gank top (which blue side does due to tribrush location) the enemy jungler moves in to Invade your camps. If you try to contest with your top laner dead, or forced to recall you will be jumped on 2v1 by their toplane and their jungler will hit you at your buff camp.
So you are forced to invade their bot side jungle and gank bot lane, due to positioning of the tribrush again.
Which lane gets hard fucked is decided by the side of the map.
Blue side, bot gets fucked
Red side, top gets fucked.
And no. I’m not moving the goal post, because they are going through the SAME THING.
3v1 top. You can’t sit under turret while they gank because turrets do nothing. They are ambient gold.
So with perfect play top you still lose your turret.
Bot and top are in the exact same situation of “mid and jungle decide their fate”.
And no the argument of “just play better” does not apply because yeah, you “can” win a 3v1 or a 2v4. But 90+% of the time you won’t. The exception is not the average.