Late game focused metas are much better for variety and gameplay than early game focused metas

Doozku··4 votes·310 views

When the meta revolves around early game, it typically revolves around who can get an early lead the fastest, and then who can snowball the game into an easy victory. This feels really bad for one side, because one mistake made by someone across the map can cost you the whole game. This also drowns out variety, because late game champions simply cannot reach their win condition when everyone picks early game champions. Games feel super snowbally, where even though you tried your best, you still feel like there was nothing you could do to turn around the play short of the enemy fucking up massively or you making a massive play.

When the meta revolves around late game however, things are different. Players can still get an early lead in this meta, since early game champions are still going to be more powerful than late game champions in these metas. But an early snowball doesn't mean the end of the game. Players can come back from dire situations easier than before because of how late game champions work. But this doesn't mean that early game champions are completely ruled out.

When there is a early game meta, the game usually ends before 25-30 minutes, or when late game champions begin to reach their win condition. Early game always happens no matter what, while games rarely reach late game unless there ended up being a stalemate. When there is a late game meta, the early game still happens, so early game champions can still be viable. They may not be meta, but they can be played. Late game champions have their win condition as a feasible goal, as well as early game champions having the ability to seize the victory.

Example: In an early game meta, LeeSin gets to constantly gank and invade the poor Sejuani's jungle. LeeSin snowballs the game super hard, and Sejuani had no way to reach her win condition unless the LeeSin played really poorly or had a massive fuckup.

In a late game meta, LeeSin has to be more careful with his ganks and invades, but he can still do them and get an upper hand on Sejuani, and possibly snowball the game. But since the pace of the game is slower, Sejuani has a chance to farm up and be useful, outscaling LeeSin and reaching her win condition.

TL;DR: In an early game meta, late game champions have no chance of getting strong unless the early game champions fuck up. In a late game meta, early game champions still get to have their moment of power and can make an impact, but late game champions still get a chance to reach their maximum potential.

5 Comments

PermabannedGaren2 votes

Only in reality, in "late game metas" like, say, the cinderhulk meta, all that matters is who has the better late game team comp, and Lee Sin in particular was at best mediocre and closer to hot garbage in that meta.

A "late game meta" is not a meta where both early game and late game champions have equal viability and can make an impact. That's a balanced meta.

A late game meta is a meta where early game success is heavily marginalized and success is founded upon how powerful your team comp is in the late game.

These threads are so stupid.

Doozku1 votes

Would you at least agree that if you are good at an early game champion, you can make more of an impact in a late game meta than someone who is really good at a late game champion in a late game meta.

MrHaZeYo1 votes

I agree, I miss late game meta. Nothing more fun than that last teamfight, everyone is full built, elixered up. One mistake and the games over, one clutch play and the game is yours.

Volibear Boss1 votes

Lategame meta would mean Gp/Fiora/Vayne meta, please not.

DunkinNoobs1 votes

The Vayne/Veigar/Sejuani meta in season 5 was the worst the game has been since I started playing. Champs like Renekton and Lucian were hot garbage and could only win if the person playing them was massively better than their opponent. And in that case, might as well just pick a late game champ yourself.

More from Gameplay

More by Doozku