I don't think WW's OP but it's hilarious how differently some regions view champions. My guess is that NA is MUCH more likely to ban annoying but not OP champions rather than actually broken ones with less of a frustration factor. WW's banrate in NA is 19% and in KR it's .4%.
source: lolalytics
doodlebob6668 votesapparently korea has way more of an early game meta because of the amount of open mids and people who start "passively inting" if they aren't doing well so a scaling jungler won't be worth that much in korea
Papa Andrei22 votesITs due to half of them being in an internet cafe so every minute is costing them.
Samflash32 votesLol wow I never thought about it this way.
+ 1
LyingOnLine2 votesI was wondering why the link was useless, then I read the post.
Anyways, idiots hate playing against WW, instead of banning something useful like Shaco or Ivern. Nothing to see here folks.
Warlord Scrap1 votesI cant remeber exactly were i read it. I know it was one of the behavior post but they said calling someone silver in korea is more offensive than calling someone bronze. It just shows different regions have different priorities. Im suprised brolaf is alloweed in kr considering how offensive your mom jokes are too koreans.
SirPurrr1 votesMaybe people in KR don't overstay/overextend as much as in NA so WW's passive is less useful.
Borbland1 votesI have to say, WW can be annoying, but he's not a LeBlanc or a Lee Sin so yeah
Ariel the Cruel1 votesMy guess is that NA is MUCH more likely to ban annoying but not OP champions rather than actually broken ones with less of a frustration factor.
Frustration has always been the primary driver behind ban rates. This is nothing new.
