How come some stat checks can be viable but not others?
e.g
are in acceptable positions and are quite good across most elos at the moment, and besides tryndamere most people are fine with these guys as long as they aren't the dominant picks (pantheon is a dominant pick so people are starting to complain, for example)
but why is say
or
being worked out to be a bit stronger so bad? i would wager that the above champs are just as abusing of low elo players if not more, but we're pretty much fine with them.
so i want to know what the difference is. keep in mind, i am completely fine with those guys being good; i'd just like the ones who i happen to like to also be good. so i'd like to know what makes you alright with one, but not the other, or if you think all of them should be kept unviable because of their nature