Edge of Night should either lose its MR or its Lethality.

WoonStruck·Feb 16, 2017·5 votes·830 views

Too much offensive potential for the defensive potential it offers.

No downside to building this item.

6 Comments

DynikusFeb 16, 20172 votes

The low cd long duration spellshield is the main thing that makes it a bit op

OctoberIVFeb 16, 20172 votes

No.

KuroCaliberFeb 16, 20172 votes

well fro mallet gives 30 AD compared to edge's 65, and also gives no lethality. Drinker/maw give high mr low AD, I think 50 on completed item, but no lethality, wits end gives 0 AD, 0 lethality and only attack speed, but also 40MR. None of these give as high offensive capabilities on a defensive item. Even merc scim only give AD, not lethality as well.

dakota saturnFeb 16, 20171 votes

Better change frozen mallet, wit's end, and hexdrinker/maw since they also have both offensive potential and a lot of defense too.

https://s27.postimg.org/w9v0ry4zn/148394996760638.jpg

WoonStruckFeb 16, 20173 votes

They don't have a lot of offensive potential though.

You must not be looking at Edge of Night properly.

Dark NephthysFeb 16, 20171 votes

I'd be fine with them removing the MR honestly. AD champions already have a great MR item for them item 3156 . Though I do agree with other people's concerns about it as well...that item shouldn't have a 10 second duration with only a 30 second CD.