Camille is like Zed, and should be treated as such.
Camille poses a bit of a problem. I wouldn't say she's "OP" in regular ranked play, but she definitely isn't weak. However, even if her winrate is balanced, she feels terrible to play against. Super unfun and oppressive.
In pro play, she has the outplay potential, pick potential, and kit to be successful even when weak or balanced in normal ranked.
Does anyone know what champion these statements also fit? That's it. Zed.
In early 2016, Zed was not necessarily OP, but felt like shit to play against. Manaless, could match the poke of most mages, and won most all-ins. It felt like there was little room for counterplay. He was also playable in pro play because of his outplay potential, despite being balanced and not explicity broken. However, he was nerfed due to his oppressive playstyle and making games feel unfun.
This can be related to Camille. Just like how Zed had multiple compensations in his kit to keep up with ranged mages, Camille does too. However, what Zed had in poke and trade combos, Camille has in damage mitigation and all-in potential.
Rather than matching enemy poke and damage, she mitigates it through her passive shield and heals. And although her trades are decent, they aren't on the level Zed's were. Most of her power is in her all-ins, where she can engage from off the screen and prevent escape. Also akin to Zed, she succeeds in pro play just due to the inherent outplay and pick potential in her kit, not necessarily due to being strong.
What I'm getting at is that Camille really isn't OP. She just feels like shit to play against, and that's fine. That shouldn't exclude her from nerfs, though, because even a balanced champion making the game unfun is a problem.
?