Aatrox - Fervor or Warlord?

Big Lincoln··2 votes·1,140 views

just a quick question, I feel like playing a bad champion cuz im in a bad mood

which one's better on aatrox

11 Comments

Hyperiön1 votes

I would probably take Fervor, the extra AD on him is pretty good.

But then on the otherhand, you get a shit ton of Health back from Warlords.

xevi1 votes

Depends on your lane matchup or playstyle. If you're in the jungle, you'll get more from the extra damage on fervor than the lifesteal on warlords. If you're in matchup that will heavily outrade you and is mobile enough to avoid fighting you for so long that you can start outrading with your dps. Take warlords.

Also depends on what you build. Warlords is a lot better with the more AD you have so a item 3074 or item 3072 mixes well. With Fervor, you can build a lot more atk spd and do really well with item 3153

Timethief491 votes

{quoted}

Depends on your lane matchup or playstyle. If you're in the jungle, you'll get more from the extra damage on fervor than the lifesteal on warlords. If you're in matchup that will heavily outrade you and is mobile enough to avoid fighting you for so long that you can start outrading with your dps. Take warlords.

Also depends on what you build. Warlords is a lot better with the more AD you have so a item 3074 or item 3072 mixes well. With Fervor, you can build a lot more atk spd and do really well with item 3153

Fervor is better in the jungle? Why? It doesn't even Stack of camps

xevi1 votes

Extra damage for ganking? You can't sustain with Warlords off of jungle monsters and the jungle already has plenty of of ways to sustain (plants, smite, item 1041, item 1039). Additionally, when you gank, you're dealing damage and chasing them down rather than trying to sustain off of them. Hence fervor being better for the jungle

Timethief491 votes

{quoted}

Extra damage for ganking? You can't sustain with Warlords off of jungle monsters and the jungle already has plenty of of ways to sustain (plants, smite, item 1041, item 1039). Additionally, when you gank, you're dealing damage and chasing them down rather than trying to sustain off of them. Hence fervor being better for the jungle

Don't think the damage is that signifikant. In the later stages you should be the unkillable lifesteal Tank which is why I would prefer Warlords. Ofc that's just my personal opinion

ayyylma01 votes

i would say hands down the new Fervor. Fervor adds AD now so you will heal more with your blood thirst and you will do more damage with you blood price up too i think 64 AD at level 18

and i think that would be better than 20% life steal at 20% health

WoonStruck1 votes

Fervor. Warlord's is bad unless you're going high AS+AD.

Fervor lets you build tankier while still having damage, which allows Aatrox to accomplish much more.

Full AD Aatrox sucks.

Honestly though, you're probably better off with CoC.

KING ATTILA1 votes

Fervor.

PermabannedGaren1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Big Lincoln,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ERMofd0i,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-12-16T19:43:45.319+0000)

just a quick question, I feel like playing a bad champion cuz im in a bad mood

which one's better on aatrox

Fervor, every time.

Warlord's is only really good for champions with big boy damage per auto attack. This basically means only crit-based champions like it such as ADCs, Yasuo, Tryndamere, maybe a crit Yi, or any variation of Graves due to how his auto attacks work.

Aatrox's autos just don't do enough damage on a one for one basis to justify warlord's. Fervor by contrast increases the damage of those autos, increases the damage of your Q, W, and E, and increases the healing of your W, and doesn't scale with stats Aatrox doesn't tend to build like Warlord's does.

So go fervor.

Big Lincoln1 votes

that necro

PermabannedGaren1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Big Lincoln,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ERMofd0i,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2017-01-12T23:31:49.699+0000)

that necro

King Attila started it.

More from Gameplay

More by Big Lincoln