yep. we gonna see lucian nerfs before we see zed nerfs.

Woook3r··102 votes·5,524 views

this balance team is toxic.

115 Comments

Deadly Mittens46 votes

If we didn't nerf X because y debatably needs nerfed more, we'd get issues.

Go ahead and discuss why Lucian should/shouldn't be nerfed, but don't base your argument on others being/not being nerfed.

Woook3r4 votes

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

Deadly Mittens47 votes
Wind Whistler6 votes

[{quoted}](name=blaze of heat,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=EAloqhcv,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2016-05-18T00:12:01.480+0000)

If we didn't nerf X because y debatably needs nerfed more, we'd get issues.

Go ahead and discuss why Lucian should/shouldn't be nerfed, but don't base your argument on others being/not being nerfed.

Don't think it's really an argument. I think he's just pointing out that Lucian got nerfed instead of Zed, while Zed definitely needs it more.

Partholonian6 votes

[{quoted}](name=Wind Whistler,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=EAloqhcv,comment-id=00040001,timestamp=2016-05-18T00:48:59.011+0000)

Don't think it's really an argument. I think he's just pointing out that Lucian got nerfed instead of Zed, while Zed definitely needs it more.

Why does Zed need it more? He is objectively easier to beat (lower winrate).

Zed has a strong and annoying laning phase, but if you manage to not feed him, he's a lousy teamfighter and if his team doesn't play well around a splitpush, will often become useless after 25 minutes. And even if his team can play around a splitpush, he rarely wants to give up lane pressure for teleport, but if he doesn't, then he's splitpushing without teleport, which creates openings for the other team. Any time he ults and doesn't get a kill he isn't going to be doing much until it comes back up, especially when teams are grouped. A fed Zed will wreck a single target.

Lucian has a strong and annoying laning phase AND good sieging and is much more useful in a teamfight. His ult has a shorter cooldown and even with the QSS changes, is harder to deny than Zed's (who can still be CC'd right as he pops up, or exhausted -- Lucian probably won't be in range). And he still has useful things to do when his ult is on CD, including safe poke, waveclear and damage to turrets. A fed Lucian will wreck your whole team.

Of course Zed would probably win 1v1 if all his cooldowns are up (even if Lucian's are too), but that's how assassin vs. marksman is supposed to go (and why marksmen generally shouldn't go to dangerous places alone), it doesn't say anything about their relative power as members of a complete team.

Zackeryss2 votes

Are you basing your argument on Zed going up against a Lucian? Really? Only a true idiot adc would try to fight the squishy killer. This is why zed needs nerfs.

Manaless poke and wavelear. Say goodbye to about 10% of your hp if he lands a shuriken, that's on a low cd and he can throw another one for 50% more dmg by using his shadow (which most do). A ton of mid laners have almost 0 counterplay against Zed, save zhonyas, which now has a longer cd than zeds ult. Its not Zeds lategame strength that's the problem, I'm completely fine with that. He should be able to single out any target and destroy them if they wonder off, that's what assassins do. But its the fact that his lane phase is so damn good that warrants nerfs. Pre - 6 he should be weak like all the other assassins, and give others the chance to take him out before he gets his ult.

ZeeWolfZ2 votes

but if you manage to not feed him, he's a lousy teamfighter and if his team doesn't play well around a splitpush, will often become useless after 25 minutes.

Have you Fought anybody other than Bronze 5? Have you fought a Diamond Zed? I have.

Everyone is useless in Bronze 5.

Hardstuck G42 votes

Lucian has god awful siege, you're higher than a kite. His wave clear is fantastic, but the fact that he only 500 range makes his sieging awful, because he can just be caught because he's too close. Now, I'm not arguing that he's too strong. In fact, as a Lucian main since Preseason 5, I want him to be nerfed so I can play him more

Errastas2 votes

Logic doesn't work on this one.

Hay5eed1 votes

That's an ok point but if you see an old shed on fire and next to it you see an entire house up in flames which one do you think you would hose down with water?

Also I just don't see why Lucian needs a nerf. I can't really use numbers here to support my logic but at no point has he felt OP to me

Deadly Mittens1 votes

Lucian has at numerous points been pretty OP, at present, he has the top pick rate and rarely is a bad choice.

That being said, this seems like one of the more balanced points of Lucian's life. They want to make range an actual weakness of his again, and while I can ask for compensation buffs, last time that turned out as a horrible blunder.

Michael Sykes1 votes

actually I read on surrenderat20 that the Zed nerfs are coming today. A rioter posted that on twitter. Most likely those won't be nerfs but adjustments to make him healthier

Jungle Lux God21 votes

You mean that one AD carry that was pick/ban at MSI and holds the single highest play rate in the entire game?

...

Not sure where I was going with the play rate argument, but there's no denying that Lucian is one of the best, if not the best, AD carry in the entire game.

That's not to say that Zed doesn't need nerfs (I think he definitely does), but the argument that Lucian shouldn't get any when he's also clearly overpowered is not a good argument at all.

ModWulf Helhammer13 votes

Your constant spamming is toxic

Woook3r20 votes

I have one thread that talks about lucian nerfs in context of other UP adc's. This thread is about lucian nerfs in the context of zed, who has an 80% ban rate. Lucian has a 2% ban rate.

Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Yet Zed has no nerfs that I can see and lucian has an actual gutting going onto the pbe.

Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians. Zeds ban rate is 40 times higher than lucians.

Very Hard Engage5 votes

thats because lucian has clear counterplay and work arounds, hes a well designed champion and sees tons of play because he actually does his job as an adc where other adcs are lacking, not that lucian SHOULD be nerfed, (thats for everyone to decide) but rather thats what all champions should strive to be like.

zed on the other hand is just a big ball of mess that cant be dealt with so instead of forcing us to counterpick against him we simply ban him out.

Woook3r6 votes

yes. and this is why you gut zed and not lucian. why would you gut one of the ONLY functional adc's? DO YOU HATE US?

Bisaknosp6 votes

they dont gut lucian wtf? they increase the q cd and reduce the w range and now? this isnt much

but i agree zed deserves nerfs more than anyone else

Woook3r6 votes

they lowered the pass thru range on his q by 300 units. this is his primary laning tool which gets him ahead. he now has 0 laning presence. Watch his winrate plummet to the mid 40s after this nerf.

ModWulf Helhammer8 votes

200: 1200 1100 to 900.

PhDs Nuts3 votes

{quoted}

200: 1200 to 900.

12 - 9 = ?

ModWulf Helhammer6 votes

Sorry, that's supposed to be 1100

PDE5 Inhib12 votes

Because his range is supposed to be his weakness...but wasn't with the Q.

ModWulf Helhammer6 votes

And then there was the time when you spammed about 7 Draven threads that absolutely no one agreed with you on, and pointed out multiple areas where you were doing wrong.

And Lucian isn't a decent ADC that outshines the others because they are bad, Lucian is one of the best ADCs who outshines the others for simply that fact. Why pick MF, Corki, or Vayne when Lucian is a stronger lane bully, mid game carry, and late game powerhouse then all three, while having more safety?

And nerfing a cooldown by 2 seconds at max rank in a champion that has at least 30% CDR isn't gutting. Neither is minor range nerfs, one of which was a spell that really didn't do much anyway.

This is the first day of the new cycle. Riot said that they would be monitoring Zed after the QSS changes and would be making the appropriate balance changes if and when they were required.

AlwaysByMySide2 votes

{quoted}

And then there was the time when you spammed about 7 Draven threads that absolutely no one agreed with you on, and pointed out multiple areas where you were doing wrong.

And Lucian isn't a decent ADC that outshines the others because they are bad, Lucian is one of the best ADCs who outshines the others for simply that fact. Why pick MF, Corki, or Vayne when Lucian is a stronger lane bully, mid game carry, and late game powerhouse then all three, while having more safety?

And nerfing a cooldown by 2 seconds at max rank in a champion that has at least 30% CDR isn't gutting. Neither is minor range nerfs, one of which was a spell that really didn't do much anyway.

This is the first day of the new cycle. Riot said that they would be monitoring Zed after the QSS changes and would be making the appropriate balance changes if and when they were required.

Lucian's late game isn't nearly as good as Vayne's.

His late game isn't even particularly good as far as ADCs go.

Durzaka3 votes

10 times. Not 40 times. 74% vs. 6.2%

Also, Lucian's pick rate is 10 times higher than Zeds.

So who gives a fuck

Woook3r3 votes

the numbers I saw put lucian at 2.5% and zed at 80%.

Durzaka2 votes

Maybe at a specific rank. But not across all ranks.

Woook3r5 votes

do you think it really matters? lucian isnt particularly overpowered. he is unbalance-able and has a fucked up kit. zed is broken and op.

Dediguise6 votes

I would say that it does matter, because it shows you only do cursory research to back up your opinion. You don't develop an opinion based on fact, but on your subjective experience. Then you exaggerate and expect to be taken seriously.

chipndip11 votes

{quoted}

I would say that it does matter, because it shows you only do cursory research to back up your opinion. You don't develop an opinion based on fact, but on your subjective experience. Then you exaggerate and expect to be taken seriously.

This is how everyone justifies banning Zed to begin with.

Snowplosion12 votes

Lucian's win rate is 3% higher Lucian is 4 times more popular Lucian's win rate is 3% higher Lucian is 4 times more popular Lucian's win rate is 3% higher Lucian is 4 times more popular

Zed does need to be nerfed, but Lucian is proving stronger right now.

Masala Chai16 votes

It's mathematically impossible for Zed to have a higher pick rate than Lucian, because Zed's ban rate is higher than Lucian's pickrate.

Lucian has a P/B percentage of 40.68%

Zed has a P/B percentage of 87.27%

That means that Zed is more than twice as likely to picked or banned in Champion select than Lucian.

Xonra3 votes

This is a dumb response, like that fact or not.

How is zed going to have a higher win rate, or be "more popular" when he is banned so much?

Did you even think before posting this response?

"Zed is banned, people don't want to play against him. He needs a nerf"

"Yeah well Lucian is played more so he deserves the ban more"

"You mean the guy who is rarely banned is played more than the guy not available to play?"

"Yeah! You understand my argument!"

<_< Think before you post


What's more sad is some people upvoted your response.

Snowplosion1 votes

You would think if a champion is bad shit crazy the would manage to have a win rate over 50 percent. Zed is strong, but he still has a win rate lower than fifty percent and also is not getting a much competitive play as Lucian. Riot is going to nerf the champion with a higher win rate and a spot in the proffesional scene before a strong solo queue pick.

Wheatloaf14 votes

Yes Zed's ban rate is ridiculously high, but his win rate is only 50.75% [champion.gg]. Lucian's win rate, according to the same site, is actually slightly lower than even that (though his play rate is that much higher, probably partially due to bans). Ban rate definitely means people don't want to play against Zed, but it's not really proof that he's overpowered. Lucian has been seen warping the meta for a while now, whereas the biggest change Zed has caused recently is an absurd shift in banning practices. Zed is on the chopping block somewhere, but why is it so surprising that they're hitting Lucian first?

Illazuel2 votes

Just think about this logically for a second. Why would people not want to play against a certain champion? oh right, because that champion has an unfair advantage and is anti fun in every way.

Allow me to elaborate on the anti fun part. He is anti fun to play against because he can pretty much roll his face on the keyboard after he hits 6 and kill anyone who isnt a full hp tank.

He is anti fun to play as for several reasons. The first of which being, and believe me, i am not alone in this opinion, your opponents will have zero respect for any "plays" you make on this champion and will not think you are any good, reguardless of weather you are or not, basically no matter how well or bad you play the champion you are playing dictates a certain level of performance reguardless of how strong of a player you are.

Fuck Zed, Yasuo, Malphite, Annie, Fizz mains. All have the same issues. Super easy to play, super overpowered, and if y ouve seen one youve seen em all. There is NO variance in play.

Wheatloaf1 votes

Believe me, I've been banning Zed along with everyone else. I don't mind going up against him every once in a while (gotta keep up practice in the matchup just in case, y'know?), but during a time like this where everyone is so certain he's broken that they'll pick him almost every time he's open, I'm just not willing to deal with that shit however many games in a row. I was just making a point that it wasn't really so ridiculous that Lucian was getting nerfed before Zed got any changes.

Best KhaZix Void9 votes

Lucian's ridiculously obnoxious right now, he deserves it way more than zed.

Mazariamonti8 votes

good, he needed a nerf.

EROTIC RAID BOSS8 votes

Lucian is lookin pretty OP rn with the ghostblade build

Zed isn't really OP

makes sense to me.

Imperial Japan4 votes

{quoted}

this balance team is toxic.

I don't get what you're trying to say because I'd much rather go against a zed before I do a Lucian

A Basic Island3 votes

i had to relook at the patch notes after reading this thread to see that zed wasn't on there

LMFAO WHAT?!?!?!?

i just assumed he was and didn't notice the first time

SpongebobIsLife1 votes

imho, neither parties need a nerf.

Firearm20123 votes

You mean... both need a nerf... right?

SpongebobIsLife3 votes

explain why they both do.

AwesomeChad1 votes

Champions that do not synergize with item 3157 nor have any built-in mechanisms that protect them from zed's ult can't deal with the champion by themselves. I know riot nerfed qss to push for more "teamwork" in regards to dealing with the zed but for a solo queue player, this is ridiculous.

I don't know what the lucian nerfs are but the whole reason behind him doing so well with item 3142 item 3071 is due to not only his kit synergizing with these items but the fact that they're so gold efficient. In my opinion, they should honestly target the items, specifically item 3142 by making it more expensive or making the build path less gold efficient.

SpongebobIsLife2 votes

here's the thing though, the champions that didn't synergize well with zhonyas were never able to 1v1 a decent zed even with sash, the difference is now his teamfight is better because he can actually assasinate a squishy mid to late game. Also with lucian, i do agree that it's the items and not him. Riot just doesnt know how to adjust them without hurting everyone else.

More from Gameplay

More by Woook3r