Boards›Gameplay

I took notes on my last 20 ranked games. Made some interesting observations.

FioraWillCarry·5/5/2019, 3:49:26 PM·1 votes·955 views

Game 1 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 2 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 3 Loss(PW) - Inferior team comp (Possibly winnable - Needed to end early)

Game 4 Win - Team mate and I carried

Game 5 Win - Enemy team Hardcore feeders.

Game 6 Loss(PW) - Darius broken, stupid team. (Possibly winnable - Needed smarter team to split instead of group and lose every team fight)

Game 7 Loss(PW) - Internet disconnected, my team had to 4v5 (Possibly winnable - If I didn't disconnect)

Game 8 Win - Better team in general

Game 9 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 10 Win - Won early,lost hard mid game, got a lucky fight later half of mid game.

Game 11 Win - Better team in general.

Game 12 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 13 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 14 Remake(Winning) - AFK on enemy team. Team had a very good start. Most likely would have been a win.

Game 15 Loss(PW) - Hardcore feeding team (Possibly winnable - Had a massive lead. Needed to play better to carry this trash team)

Game 16 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 17 Remake(Even) - AFK on enemy team.

Game 18 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 19 Loss - Hardcore feeding team (Unwinnable)

Game 20 Loss(PW) - Tilted from all the feeding teams I got last few games. Left the game early after team starts hard feeding(Possibly winnable - Stats after game showed my team caught up. If I stayed we might have won)

I tried to be as objective as possible when taking these notes.

Some things to note:

Only 8 of 18 games played were actually unwinnable. Games denoted as PW were games where I felt we could have won if I was a better player.

Trolls and inters are actually quite rare. There were none in any of these games. AFKs are also quite rare. Only 2 in 20 games.

A vast majority of losses are due to hard core feeders but not enough so to prevent climbing.

A very interesting thing is how few hardcore feeders actually ended up on the enemy team. Only once in 18 games did we win due to hard core feeders but lost 8 games for the same reason.

What observations can you make?

11 Comments

mack91125/5/2019, 4:18:01 PM4 votes

My observation is that your attitude is very poor and rather self reflecting on your own mistakes you come onto these boards to deflect blame.

You should never deem a match unwinnable.

chipndip15/5/2019, 4:15:28 PM1 votes

8/18 valid games are losses due to someone feeding, and 2 out of 20 games had afks. Your own notes indicate that it was literally impossible for you to climb at all during this experiment, and even if you did, your gains would be minimal over the span of 20 games.

BigFBear5/5/2019, 4:16:26 PM1 votes

AFKs are also quite rare. Only 2 in 20 games.

3 in 20 games. You forgot yourself, tiltboi.

PhDs Nuts5/5/2019, 4:16:26 PM1 votes

{quoted}

Game 6 Loss(PW) - Darius broken

u wot m8?

Inkling Commando5/5/2019, 8:30:14 PM1 votes

so how many games were there surrender spams?

MrFawknSunshine5/5/2019, 9:00:52 PM1 votes

ok so 8 out 18 that is nearly 50% of games you had control of winning, to climb you just need to win + 50%

and out of those games where you had feeding teammates you dont give credit to the enemy for being better and taking advantage of those mistakes your team made.

so for the most part match making was some what fair. you got unluck in a couple of games of your team playing badly for whatever reason ( the feeders ) other games was always a chance to win if people made better decisions.