just had my first olaf mid

Budupops·Oct 3, 2015·11 votes·951 views

went 0-12, had to report for intentional feeding.

Its a shame what worlds do to the community.

14 Comments

ZerlabsOct 3, 201514 votes

you are gold 5, silver mmr, probably elo boosted who haven't played ranked in awhile if someone wants to try olaf mid in normals let him, you getting elo boosted hurts this community than someone trying out olaf mid in normals and doing poorly, there's a reason why its called normals, to try out things before ranked, you getting salty over a ranked game shows how silver you really are

Worldline42Oct 3, 20159 votes

op knew he got elo boosted and would get stomped on in ranked so normals means everything for him, reporting people for intentionally feeding just because they do bad one game shows how immature op is and he has the audacity to post in the forums like we are gonna back his elo boosted ass up

WeiNaShanOct 3, 20157 votes

I reported op as well, his kind makes me sick, gets elo boosted and then cries over a normals game when someone wants to try something new

albertagentOct 3, 20156 votes

I feel bad for op actually, he must have abandonment issues if he feels the need to report someone over a normals game, specially when olaf wasn't intentionally feeding, also he must have issues if he has to pay for an elo boost over a video game

BudupopsOct 3, 20151 votes

actually if u check my match history this never happened, just wanted to see how the community would respond

BudupopsOct 3, 20151 votes

also why do you assume i got elo boosted? if you actually look at my ranked games i duo only around 4 times in over 200 games, and i didnt duo in provisional. i was placed in bronze 2

The Voids CallOct 3, 20156 votes

i hate how people feel the need to report people for doing bad in a game just because they did bad. It might be the first they've played that champion/build/position, it's a sad day when the game is only about winning and not having fun. It's the same thing that happened to world of warcraft, the game isnt' about the exploration of the game, both mechanically and strategically, all that people seem to care about now is optimizing what already exists.

GwellaouenOct 3, 20151 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Voids Call,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ArLcGTEn,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2015-10-03T02:08:23.869+0000)

i hate how people feel the need to report people for doing bad in a game just because they did bad. It might be the first they've played that champion/build/position, it's a sad day when the game is only about winning and not having fun. It's the same thing that happened to world of warcraft, the game isnt' about the exploration of the game, both mechanically and strategically, all that people seem to care about now is optimizing what already exists.

True.

I got so many bad games with a champ I tried to practice. Bard was my worst. My team just didn't want to play with me. Like ... What ? XD I don't think I've been reported once tough. If I would have been report this many times, I would have got a temporary ban. This week Riot gave me the icon that prove otherwise.

We have to see the difference between real intentional feeding and trying to be better. I know it's hard. I know I don't like either people who are feeding but eh ... Everyone has surely feed once in this game.

P.S.: Sorry about mistakes in English.

HaIlMonitorOct 3, 20155 votes

Worlds is "Damnit all we see in lee sin and Leblanc" one minute then the next "Damnit this new random strategy is ruining solo que" Pick a side people! lol

AtheosisXOct 3, 20157 votes

{quoted}

Worlds is "Damnit all we see in lee sin and Leblanc" one minute then the next "Damnit this new random strategy is ruining solo que" Pick a side people! lol

It can all be summed up with "Damnit I wish these kids would stop copying the pros!"

RalanrOct 3, 20153 votes

"Back in my day, kids used to make their own strategy instead of following this thing called a 'meta'"

I only started a few years ago, I just couldn't resist.

HaIlMonitorOct 3, 20152 votes

It wouldn't matter if they did the correct strategy with the champion. A good example is the real reason (I assume) Faker picked Olaf was because when played correctly stomps Irelia. Her E is worthless vs when he has ult, She does less damage, has less sustain. When people see it though they think "Olaf is good in mid!". People blindly fallow instead of copying them lol.

SalidfingersOct 3, 20152 votes

I didnt see worlds, So you're saying they took irelia mid and he took Olaf. I say good choice.

I take olaf against irelia all the time and kick ass.

Very Hard EngageOct 3, 20153 votes

the main issue is people dont know what it accomplishes, or what goal the team has in mind when they pick olaf mid.

instead they see "olaf mid, faker did it, must be new faker, (((picks olaf mid 5 games in a row))) (damn why did my team suck!?!?!?)"

personally i dont even know what it does other than reliable in lane poke, potentially force someone out of lane and on top of that provide an additional front line for your carry.

so i opt not to take it.

if someone can make it work, great, but please, think about what you want from the champ you pick, i counterpick, counter build, and work with my team mates and ive done nothing but climb.