Am I the Only One Who Liked the Old URF Better?

Ap2626·8/9/2017, 5:38:02 PM·2 votes·409 views

So...obviously Riot's idea with ARURF was to prevent people from constantly picking ridiculously overpowered URF champions and stomping the game. My issue with this is that now if a team gets Garen, Sona, and Zed (just for example) they have an EXTREMELY high chance of winning...and there is SO MUCH LUCK INVOLVED. Also, it isn't fun to get Kalista 3 matches in a row in URF because she really isn't that great. I think URF would be consistently better for each player if the 10 blind ban system was implemented(so each player can remove the OP champ of their choice) and you could pick your own champion so that you get someone that is at least decently powerful and a champion that you know how to play (this isn't ARAM after all).

Thanks for reading my rant <3

I want to hear your opinions on this!

5 Comments

Birbonius8/9/2017, 6:16:24 PM2 votes

"Am i the only one..." No.

40% of the threads about ArUrf are "old urf was better,with this new random there is no fun" other 59% is "where is it comin". the last 1% are the good threads (like yours) in which,doesn't matter if ranting or holding an argument in favor of ArUrf, there is actually a bit of discussion possible.

Now,sorry for that,but i hate it when a topic comes back again over and over,as i said your thread does give discussion and so we shall do that.

I prefer ArUrf because,being it a RGM,i wanna have fun no matter what happens,i don't care if the enemy gets a sona,as long as i get to have fun with my permagassing singed,it will just mean that i've lost a match of a mode in which that thing doesn't matter at all. In fact,when i don't know what champ to play or when i need to de-tilt myself and i can't find anything good to do so,i go back in the game queuing up for Aram,because there i can actually fuck up a bit without having real consequences (obv i don't troll or int,even against bots that could come with problems) and i can relax and i don't have to care about choosing a champ to play,i just want to play a bit,muting everyone's pings too if needed since in Aram there is no baron to care about. And the same applies on ArUrf,at least for me: Just gimme something and i'll take care of myself.

I wouldn't mind original URF,but as Sarutobi said it would lead to people flaming just so that you would choose what they wanted you to choose to have their easy win and brag. But i also get the problem you and others talk about: The banned champs are now avalaible,so i thought about a thing: If the problem is only about the OP champs,then give the 6-way ban and after that phase goes through,give 2-3 random options between the champs the summoner has avalaible,and it will have to choose between those. So you can actually get to have fun and possibly win even if you don't get kissed by luck.

Sarutobi8/9/2017, 5:52:26 PM1 votes

The only reason why i like ARURF is mainly because it forces people to actually play new champion. Its so annoying even for regular play, to see the same damn champions over and over again. Then there are the toxic people who try to harass you during champ select because you want to play a certain champion and they want you to pick that one op champion. its annoying as all hell, and i just want to enjoy the mode with a champion i want to play not because people think this game mode should be as serious as Rank!

Weathered8/9/2017, 6:05:11 PM1 votes

The community is pretty split, refer to multiple highly upvoted and downvoted posts about this topic that are made every time URF or ARURF come back onto live servers.

Engelin8/9/2017, 6:18:03 PM1 votes

Original URF was the best because everyone was just trying out champions they thought would be good. By the second URF, a meta had formed and you would be punished with "no fun allowed" by picking anyone other than Hec, Ryze, etc.

ARURF will never be as fun as the very first URF, but the randomization is a necessity, sadly.