"The weakest player shouldn't matter!"
"I went 5/0 in lane and still lost!"
Sorry, but their 0/5 weakest player shouldn't matter right? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
"I went 5/0 in lane and still lost!"
Sorry, but their 0/5 weakest player shouldn't matter right? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
So every game you go 5/0 its due to one person and not 2-3 people as a combination?
also
I went 5/0 in lane and still lost!
Usually implies the weakest player is on their team, so saying
Sorry, but their 0/5 weakest player shouldn't matter right?
After that is a bit unrelated. Not to mention that most people are saying that the weakest player shouldnt have a large influence than the strongest player. If my Illaoi gives nasus 5 kills without being ganked and dies under tower then yes, illaoi did just fuck up the game single handedly. But should nasus scale so hard that we need to catch him alone and blow all of our CC/ No.
also weakest player =/= least fed. weakest player can just mean someone who is bad and makes stupid mistakes to throw a game by themselves. Like the platinum
who's in the enemy base getting caught out trying to harass with q's while his team is pushing top and warding baron. Holy shit that was tilting...
It is entirely possible for those 5 kills to be spread over different lanes. You know, because it's a team of 5.
strawman