[{quoted}](name=Red Death LoL,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=7gVbb8EG,comment-id=000b00000000,timestamp=2016-02-14T09:58:20.181+0000)
Well first of all the situation I described was hypothetical and didn't actually happen to me like you seem to think.
Could have fooled me.
Silver 5 and I dive people as Shaco at lvl 3 successfully often enough and know that Xin sure as hell can too.
Silver 5....Yes. Cheese works in Silver 5 and people who aren't smart enough to deal with Shaco or Xin. Not surprising.
2nd question practically answers the 1st, and we all know how incredibly hard is to get kills as Xin.
Early game? Can be. He has to rely entirely on autos and one knock-up/gapcloser. You seem to think he starts the game with 15 stacks of sated.
Lux has a root, a slow, and a sheild. Ziggs has a slow, and a mini knockback. Both of their slows are aoe with Lux's cover a much larger aoe, also Zigg's has an activation time before it will also slow or damage anyone. Lux has a root, Zigg's does not. Lux has a shield, Ziggs does not. Zigg's mini knockback is his escape so he has to choose between using on an enemy or himself, and isn't the most reliable of escapes. Lux has much more available to her to stop a dive than Zigg's.
Correction. Lux has a root, slow and shield. Ziggs has a knockback, slow and self-knockback. Lux and Ziggs cover the same AoE with their slows. Here's a crazy idea: Save Ziggs knockback for when Xin is on top of you. He has one gap closer. If he botches it, he's screwed. The goal isn't to stop the dive, it's to come out ahead. Once again: How low are you that he can dive a turret? A level three xin is nowhere near tanky enough to freely dive a turret and ZIggs should have more than enough tools to deal with him...unless you got caught. Once more, your fault, not the champion.
It says "Generalization.jpg" I assume this was supposed to be a relevant image but its not showing up, so I don't know what its supposed to mean, You can't quote something I didn't say, so you essentially made this up. "I didn't pick the OP so I lose" This is the message I was trying to convey. it's the only reason I'm bad." This is just you making stuff up and putting words in my mouth, and I have a 58% winrate in ranked so I'm not bad
Lordy lordy this post. Generalization.jpg is me typing out that you're making a generalization in a sarcastic manner. You are completely, 100% implying that the reason pros are pros is because they abuse powerful champs. Hey, by the way, 58% winrate in Silver V means jack shit. Congratulations on shining in Silver and Bronze, let me know when you have a winrate in a tier that matters.
I blaming champions for being unfair and giving them their well deserved complaint's. Again I have a 58% winrate so I think I play smart enough.
No. You don't. You're playing in Silver V. You're not good. I'm not good. If you are Bronze-to-gold, you are terrible to decidedly average. Win rates mean nothing unless it's in the highest tier of play or it is such a high win-rate that it defies conventional logic. Silver V is nothing, a 58% win rate in Silver V is nothing and you don't know what you're talking about.
I don't know what this is.
The chemical compound for salt. Which seems to be oozing from every orifice you have.