Grading system should not be biased toward CS

The Deckowner·Apr 3, 2017·4 votes·395 views

http://i.imgur.com/oB6RqJW.jpg Rito's grading system consider afk farming as better performance than destroying enemy towers, killing champions, and securing neutral buffs. This is wrong and is not ok!

6 Comments

KãtãrinãApr 3, 20171 votes

cs is only a small factor, and grading is soley based on you (not your team) The grading is based on the average gragas player in the jungle at roughly your elo. so supposedly the average is roughly the same. Since an S is above average i believe

Handy Sandy Apr 3, 20171 votes

It's not wrong, and it is ok. Csing is a skill which you should be good at since you're doing it almost all the time. Since Gragas also lanes it might have lowered your score since your cs isn't very good compared to theirs but I'm not sure if the system can tell jungle from lane Gragas.

Deep Terror NamiApr 3, 20171 votes

Why have you turned "Grade isn't just about KDA" into "Grade is all about CS"?

The DeckownerApr 4, 20171 votes

Because numerous times I had been literally afk farming and gotten S grades with 20%kp and 0 tower destroyed. It is obvious that CS overvalue everything else in the grading system.

RQ AmiableApr 3, 20171 votes

tbh, being a jungle main. if you had like 25 more cs. you would have gotten an s- or an s. csing is a skill. and you shouldn't say it shouldn't count.

The DeckownerApr 4, 20171 votes

Why farm camps when you can farm champions and towers? I was full build by 30 minute with about 100 farm, there was literally no reason for me to farm jungle camps, every time I leave base I take a blue buff or dragon/baron then just run down a lane to push all the structures with team, there is no need to farm.