My teammates flamed our support and then he went afk
Almost like there's a relationship here that most of the people who play this game don't see.
Almost like there's a relationship here that most of the people who play this game don't see.
This is a pretty vague post
I think they meant correlation or causality? I don't understand how the post relates to the title, either.
Yeah thinking about it after the fact I think that's what they maybe meant... like flaming = tilt so why flame teammates if you want to win the game kind of thing
That's annoying. I usually don't have bad experiences, but last night I played with a 5-man. (4 friends and me...) Game1 - I go Veigar vs a Janna, unknown ADC. I generally like to bully passive supports. I told my team I can't support the Vayne well, but they said ok. Somehow Mid goes like 0-4, disconnects, and loses inner turret while we are still laning for first item. (Top also loses). Somehow I get blamed for the poor game.
Game2 - I tell them I only play supp. Offer Janna, Sona, etc. See I am vs a Draven. Different Vayne says like "pick anyone, pick Veigar" but was super quiet sounded was "just not veigar??" still don't know. Either way easy pokes and zone on Draven (who was 0-3-3 in lane) (still bad for 3 deaths). Mid dies in the first five minutes to ignite. Vayne eventually says we need to kill this Draven (<50%) so I flash stun and hit my skills, but Vayne couldn't close the gap so Voli kills me. Mid continues to die to Jg and Mid. I get blamed again. I also offered to dodge. A comp of Fizz and Shaco is just not pleasant. They said no.
Game3 - Someone again tries to take support. They talk about being on tilt. So I just left, was super late anyways.
I don't mind, I will try to play with them again sometime. Hopefully we can communicate better as a team. There are definitely ways I could have played better. But when Mid is going 0-4 both games don't blame the support. The sad part is we could have won both of those games (hence I could have played better). But when people are stacking the blame on you, it is tough. And they weren't communicating and acting like they wanted to win.
Vayne Veigar is a horrible lane combo.
I told them that, they said they were ok game 1. Top and Mid lost before we even got to leave lane. Eventually got Vayne 3-0, but that is when other solo laner enemies had 4 kills or more. No matter what support I picked there is no way I was going to feed the Vayne fast enough to rush out of lane phase, unless just being super reckless.
Game 2. Eh.
I could have done better. I have no problem admitting that. I also have no problem with a teammate picking Vayne, but the team has to play safe until the Vayne gets items. What can they expect either botlaner to do when solo lanes complete 2 items to our 1.
Veigar itself is an eh pick for many people. I think he works fine in sup, but I can understand if people argue he isn't traditional.
I know he isn't bad, I play veigar sup (m6 Vei), but with that combo you literally have no lane presence at all, and lose almost every trade early unless someone fucks up
Well I like said. I asked them if I could go Veigar despite not being able to support her. It just didn't work out, not necessarily our lanes fault imo.