The numbers don't lie. If you look on op.gg she's in the top 5 for highest played champs in literally every division. And despite her insanely high play rate she has AT LEAST a 51% win rate in literally every division. For a while I thought people were just playing bad against her, but when she's performing this well everywhere she's played you know something's wrong.
Ragnaveil2 votesU.GG has her at 53%. Honestly, both of these should happen (for their respective issues): Her cds get upped (mainly Q (unsure of e)). Aftershock is replaced with CotC. Allows tanks to be given better base stats.
Infernape1 votesU.GG has her at 53%. Honestly, both of these should happen (for their respective issues): Her cds get upped (mainly Q (unsure of e)). Aftershock is replaced with CotC. Allows tanks to be given better base stats.
Honestly Riot kept pumping her with buffs when she did not even need them.
Or Aftershock having reduced effectiveness on ranged champions. Thresh can be compensated (somehow).
Hemulen Magi2 votesI think Lux does a little bit too much damage when she's supporting. Her base damage should probably be nerfed. I think she would be fine if she played as a slightly lower damage utility catcher when in the support role. I don't think Aftershock is a problem on 'mages' if they're playing as catchers instead, but they don't seem to be sacrificing quite enough damage when opting for such a playstyle.
Garen is adopted1 votesBeing played a lot doesn't matter she's broken lol, literally she's at the best an A tier for support and B for mid.
boricCentaur11 votesStats are not reasons or proof. Also thresh have you complained about him if you haven't then you are just being biased towards lux since he has better stats then her in support and for a lot longer.
Like come on if you're going to give stats as a reason you have to do it to EVERY CHAMPION but it's still not a reason.
Cloud2732 votesStats are not reasons or proof. Also thresh have you complained about him if you haven't then you are just being biased towards lux since he has better stats then her in support and for a lot longer.
Like come on if you're going to give stats as a reason you have to do it to EVERY CHAMPION but it's still not a reason.
I agree high play rates alone aren't enough to justify a nerf, but it reinforces my point. Literally EVERYWHERE she's played she has a MINIMUM of 51% winrate (rounded up). In higher divisions/elos these numbers are even higher. As far as Thresh goes, I wouldn't mind seeing that champ nerfed. Just get him out of the meta for awhile. PLEASE.
3ternalkarma1 votesThe numbers don't lie. If you look on op.gg she's in the top 5 for highest played champs in literally every division. And despite her insanely high play rate she has AT LEAST a 51% win rate in literally every division. For a while I thought people were just playing bad against her, but when she's performing this well everywhere she's played you know something's wrong.
she will always perform well because of the simple fact she is safe: safe = not feeding: not feeding = no snowballing