I'm pretty sure I specifically said that my first point was to show that the arguments about Veigar were invalid. In fact, my entire post was about how the points made against Veigar being bad were wrong. Once again your reading comprehension has failed.
For my second point, it was to show that I do have experience playing with decent players, and not just bronze skrublords that you were so keen to assume I was. Why you assume everything is meant to be bragging and not have logical value is beyond me...
Point 3 was supposed to be a
3.
format but it was corrected to be like that for some reason so ill just move on to point 4 (which is really point 3 with 2 parts to it)
My 4th point: Again, the delay on Veigar's stun is really not that bad. LCS abandoned Veigar for the numerous attributes that I listed later in my post (see the "Overall" part of my post). To add to that, other champions do his job more safely making him not the most viable champion.
Part 2 of my 4th point
Me: "If you think Veigar's stun is bad and his damage is crap then that problem is on you, definitely not the champ"
You: "well... no... thats not how it works... do you even have the slightest idea how champions differ and work?"
Your response defended the OP for saying his damage is crap. All I said is that if the OP's Veigar isn't doing damage than it's his fault, not the champions. This is the post that literally started our conversation, and you say Veigar's damage was never mentioned?
As for my ranked stats: Don't mistake annoyance with anger man. I am annoyed that you brought irrelevant evidence, trying to pass it off to disprove my points. I thought we would've had a real debate with actual logic instead of mindless insults to try to please our egos, but then you had to go ahead and start insulting me without any reason...
You wonder why I don't play ranked? Because ranked is stressful and in many ways less competitive. I find normals more fun with less toxic players and having an overall better community than ranked players. I have the impression that ranked players have an ego, thinking they are better than normal players because they have this magical thing called LP. I feel it's a stupid mindset, but if players are going to continue disregarding/insulting me based on 15ish games I played over a year ago than maybe I do have to play a few ranked games just to get rid of this stupid "flaw" that some people think I have.
My words don't change whether I'm bronze or challenger. If you were having this conversation with Faker you would most likely be agreeing with me because you allow his rank to have more meaning than his actual words, which is inherently stupid. Meanings don't change, but how you perceive them do based on how you see the messenger.
What truly perplexes me is why you have this "I'm better than you" attitude when you yourself aren't ranked. You can act like calling me bronze/silver elo effects the logic behind my words, but the bottom line is that you are no better yourself. So let me ask you, why do you not play ranked but feel the need to insult others for not playing ranked? Hypocrisy at it's finest