Cloud 9? Psshhhhh....
more like clean 9 with the perfect play in record
more like clean 9 with the perfect play in record
I still see C9 advancing from Groups honestly at this point.
They did it last year, if they hit semi finals i am happy, same goes for tsm and imt.
I personally think all 3 NA teams will make it out of groups, only if C9 are in Group A and not Group C.
Unfortunately, there's only a 1 in 4 chance of that happening. We have to be drawn first, or else we're in C.
Indeed, just hope they face EDG and get a rematch with AHQ, as well SKT.
;]
God damn, did we luck out there. 25% chance for that to happen.
We also have the pleasure of facing SKT for our first game, which, I guess is both good and bad. We can throw the kitchen sink at them, and try to surprise them with any pocket picks we may have. However, any weakness are going to be torn asunder, and be made glaringly obvious.
Couple comments here.
First, while i haven't been following the draws, I'm fairly confident we have more than a 25% chance at group A. I'd imagine at least 1 of the other qualifying teams would be ineligible for group A due to regional restrictions (i.e. two eu or two Chinese teams can't be in the same group, surely group A isn't missing all 3 of eu/chn/na?). In that case we'd have a 25% chance of being drawn first, plus whatever chance that an ineligible team is drawn first (25% let's say) times the chance we're drawn second given we weren't drawn first (33%). It simplifies to our chance being 1 over the number of eligible teams for group A (so if 1 ineligible then 33%, if two then 50%).
Second, i strongly disagree with the idea of throwing the kitchen sink at our first match, for any NA team. We've done it every world's and it has never worked for us. Remember (i think 2015) when NA had the lane swap meta and dominated week 1 of worlds (i believe our record equaled or maybe bettered even Korea!) but by week 2 they were already better than us at it. Go 3-0 then 0-3 and lose the tiebreaker game. If we instead threw week 1 and dominated week 2, we'd have won all 3 tiebreaker games and all 3 teams make it out of groups.
Likewise i think last year we had someone who dominated on Aurelion Sol. Take it out game 1 and beat Korea with it, then have it banned out. Does us no good, so Korea finishes 5-1, China still goes 4-2, and we go 3-3 and don't make it out of groups (I'm not sure if that actually happened, but the point is if we pull it out against China instead then Korea goes 6-0, and we tie China 3-3 and get a tiebreaker to try to make it out.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't try our best in every game. Just that if we want NA to perform at world's we need to save our one-offs for games that count. Making a statement by beating SKT in game 1 means a lot for our pride, but absolutely nothing for getting through groups. We still depend on either taking a game off another big region without it (which if we do anyways, we can use the strategy in the tiebreaker OR in the quarterfinals if we don't need it!) or having them get upset by the wildcard.
We've proven year after year that NA is capable of beating the best teams in a game where both teams can prepare secretly. Year after year we've also shown that Korea dominates us at adapting at world's, and the other major regions are often better at it too. So unless we intend to go in to world's with 5 different strategies that are all better than anything the other regions can come up with and bring a different one out each week, we need to stop burning our secret weapons in week 1 against the Korean powerhouse and save them for games that will get us out of groups or through a knockout stage.
Here's how it played out:
TSM and Immortals are in Groups D and B respectively. So, Cloud 9 could only be in Group A or C.
G2 and Misfits are in groups C and D respectively. So, Fnatic could only be in groups A or B.
EDG and RNG are in groups A and C respectively. So, WE could only be in B or D.
Fenerbache could go anywhere.
Obviously, the first draw is for the team that goes into group A. This is how each draw would have played out after the first draw.
C9 gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. Fnatic is forced into Group B because of that. Then, because of that WE is forced into Group D. Fenerbache is forced into Group C since it's the only one left. (This is how it actually happened.)
Fnatic gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. C9 is forced into Group C. Now, we have a coin flip as to whether Fenerbache or WE get groups B or D.
Fenerbache gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. Fnatic is forced into group B, C9 is forced into group C, and WE is forced into group D.
WE gets drawn first, and goes to group B, since it can't be in A. Fnatic is forced into group A, C9 is forced into C, and Fenerbache is in D.
So....yes. 25% chance. It all depended on the first draw.
[{quoted}](name=Paleo Electro,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=LwFEIEbh,comment-id=00030000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-29T15:53:54.865+0000)
Here's how it played out:
TSM and Immortals are in Groups D and B respectively. So, Cloud 9 could only be in Group A or C.
G2 and Misfits are in groups C and D respectively. So, Fnatic could only be in groups A or B.
EDG and RNG are in groups A and C respectively. So, WE could only be in B or D.
Fenerbache could go anywhere.
Obviously, the first draw is for the team that goes into group A. This is how each draw would have played out after the first draw.
C9 gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. Fnatic is forced into Group B because of that. Then, because of that WE is forced into Group D. Fenerbache is forced into Group C since it's the only one left. (This is how it actually happened.)
Fnatic gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. C9 is forced into Group C. Now, we have a coin flip as to whether Fenerbache or WE get groups B or D.
Fenerbache gets drawn first, and goes to Group A. Fnatic is forced into group B, C9 is forced into group C, and WE is forced into group D.
WE gets drawn first, and goes to group B, since it can't be in A. Fnatic is forced into group A, C9 is forced into C, and Fenerbache is in D.
So....yes. 25% chance. It all depended on the first draw.
Ah I see, so while I was correct in assuming there would be a team that couldn't get in to group A (WE), it didn't matter since them being put in group B would force another team in to group A. Thanks for the explanation!
All 3 NA teams face their top opponents in first game, Immortals face Longzhu Gaming, Cloud 9 vs SK Telecom T1 and Team Solomid face both Flash Wolves and WE in their next game. Like you said having the "pleasure" to face SKT; the top teams should come as an advantage for NA to face first because it gets the harder teams out of the way first.
Win your first game and not only are you 1-0, but you also beat the heavy favorite to win the group.
SKT v C9 the rematch; gotta go with C9 at least taking SKT to the limit this time, not only do I think Huni just isn't as good as Marin/Duke, I think Impact will actually have his way with him and in general be a better teamfighter. If there's a time for SKT to fall, this is it !
This is also NA's realist chance and best to win or come close to winning Worlds. If 2 out of 3 NA teams get eliminated in groups this year, or all 3 - I'm done with League of Legends, Dunkey Style !
Cause not only will it have been 7 years of being garbage on the international level but also a waste of time since NA has had advantage after advantage over the years such as;
Playing a year longer than Korea until they got their server later on down the road.
Auto-locked in the QT Finals of Worlds, only to get rekt by Fnatic 2-1.
Having the easiest group until H2K of 2016 in 2014 vs SK, TPA and RNG only to lose to SK on the last day, having to face SSW in the bracket stage.
Having Worlds take place on home-court, only to lose to RNG twice, SKT twice, an IWC twice.
And the worst part for NA at Worlds, is the first half of Worlds !!!!!!! Each year, NA is up in some way in groups only to blow our leads.
2014 TSM 4-1 - lost final game 4-2. C9 up 2-0 only to lose 2 straight games, as well as their tie-breaker to avoid SSB. LMQ 2-0 - only to lose 4 straight games.
2015 CLG 2-0 - lost their last 4 games/ 2-4. TSM 1-5. C9 up 3-0 in groups, only to lose 3 games but also their tie-breaker(again) ending 3-4.
2016 All 3 NA teams CLG, TSM and C9 were up 2-1 in groups and all ending at 3-3.
It's so sad and annoying to actually cheer for this and want to be apart of something that's as predictable as say NFL(NE/DEN), NHL(PIT/CHI), NBA(CLE/GSW) for the same winners and for the same plot to unfold, year after year.
If TSM doesn't make it out of groups this year, there are going to be problems. Really, the only team they should be slightly worried about is WE. Misfits and Flash Wolves should be a cake walk for them.
I do feel bad for Immortals, however. Not only is this their first worlds, but they also have the pleasure of facing Long Zhu, Gigabyte Marines AND Fnatic. Two of which are no strangers at all to the international scene, and the other having bested SKT, which is no small feat, since SKT is the TSM of Korea (or, should I say TSM is the SKT of NA........oh well). If their finals performance is anything to go off of, this could be incredibly difficult for them.
Then we have our beloved Cloud 9. People are saying that AHQ is lucky to even be at worlds, and will most likely keel over and die pretty quickly. EDG is kind of a wild card. They do tend to choke pretty damn hard at pretty much any international scene they show up to, but the fact still remains that they are the undispitued kings of China. If they do decide to show up at Worlds, I doubt even SKT can withstand them.
Speaking of...
I've heard rumors that this SKT is potentially the weakest we've seen yet. It's all the same players, but that's probably why. They're probably getting tired, and I wouldn't blame them at all. If there is ever a time to topple Faker's throne, this is it, and, to be completely honest, I don't think there is any NA team better for the job than Cloud 9.
TSM chokes so hard every year. They struggle to get out of any group they're put in, even if they're favored to get out. This year should be easy, but I still have my doubts.
Immortals, as I said, is new to the international scene, and already have their hands full. In all honesty, I don't see Immortals making it out of groups, which, really, isn't a bad thing. They just drew the short straw.
Cloud 9 has been the only team recently to even make it out of groups, and we did so against a better SKT, and at a time where I feel we were honestly performing worse than we are now. It's still a David and Goliath story, but not as much as it has been previously.
Either way, I am EXTREMELY excited to see this play out.
People s$it on the NA finals as being sloppy, bad and overall a TSM cake-walk in which is very saddening, mainly because I thought IMT played very well against a team that dominated NA 2 splits ago.
Are the GAM a top 16 team - YES, are they better now oppose to MSI - NO. Not only did GAM get worse in my opinion, they also will have to face better top/jng duo in IMT and LZ, not to mention FNC has Soaz, in which he always makes his opponents look stupid with his crazy TP/outplays under tower etc.
Overall, Group B is the wildcard group mainly because every team was garbage a split/year ago. Streaks and hot-hands tend to go cold if they're not real but instead just "driving it like - they stole it" type of teams.
Group A could be interesting but at the same time, it's one of the more "boring" groups, only because we've seen SKT v EDG(2015 MSI, 2015 Worlds), SKT v AHQ(2015 Worlds), EDG v AHQ(2014 Worlds, 2016 Worlds) countless times in the past with the same result for the most part. Every team in this group has faced each other in some way or another at Worlds, even C9 who faced AHQ in 2015 and SKT in 2016. My biggest question mark is C9 v EDG, not only has EDG really been the TSM of the LPL, they've also played like TSM when it comes to Worlds and barely making it out of groups, via tie-breaker 2 out of the last 3 years, only to get dominated in the first round 3 years in a row. Will it change this year -IDK.
" I've heard rumors that this SKT is potentially the weakest we've seen yet"
However, I don't see SKT winning Worlds, I don't see only C9 advancing from groups for NA and I don't see EDG being this dominate team from the LPL.
Who do you think is making it out of groups?
I have SKT and C9 for group A (only cause I'm a big C9 fan).
Group B, Long Zhu and.......second seed is tough. I'll say Immortals due to your explanation of GAM.
Group C, SSG and RNG (though I'm rooting for Fenerbache all the way).
Group D, WE and TSM.
Hard to say right now, will most likely do up my annual stat-standing predictions later on tonight tho and will comment/give my thoughts. I will say you and I have the same teams advancing with the exception of two(SKT/C9/LZ/IMT/SSG/RNG/WE/TSM) but which two ? lol
Group A SK Telecom T1 5-1 Cloud 9 4-2 Edward Gaming 2-4 AHQ Esports 1-5
Group B Immortals 5-1 Longzhu Gaming 4-2 Fnatic 2-4 Gigabyte Marines 1-5
Group C Royal Never Give Up 4-2//5-2 G2 Esports 4-2//4-3 Samsung Galaxy 4-2 1907 0-6 ( I believe RNG/G2 and SSG will pretty much beat each other, in which I "think" the fastest game avg time decides the "tie-breaker" among 3 teams, in which in my mind SSG will be eliminated within those "rules" mainly because I see SSG having a fairly long group stage.
Group D Team Solomid 4-2//5-2 Flash Wolves 4-2//4-3 Team World Elite 3-3 Misfits 1-5
Putting WE under Flash Wolves? That's kind of surprising. Isn't everyone saying that WE is potentially one of the strongest teams there?
The thing about WE and I will say, you can always get better but looking at WE from pre MSI to now, I'm not impressed.
WE was a team that was hot during the spring and fell off during the summer, only to make it to Worlds because of points + previous success during the spring split. Pretty much the LPL version of CLG a year ago and were you all that impressed with CLG during the Summer split +Playoffs ? Sure, CLG won some big games like against G2(2X) and Rox but overall, they weren't that great.
People can say WE can beat all 3 teams with their early aggression but when it comes to Worlds, the games slows down and it's only getting longer, each year every worlds averages longer and longer game times and with teams such as TSM and FW who are prone to having long games on the International level, I gotta go with the teams that have the better synergy with it's best players.
With that said, if FW and TSM slow down the pace I do see WE finishing behind FW but we will have to wait and see.
[{quoted}](name=Paleo Electro,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=LwFEIEbh,comment-id=000300000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-09-29T09:59:45.860+0000)
God damn, did we luck out there. 25% chance for that to happen.
We also have the pleasure of facing SKT for our first game, which, I guess is both good and bad. We can throw the kitchen sink at them, and try to surprise them with any pocket picks we may have. However, any weakness are going to be torn asunder, and be made glaringly obvious.
I'd rather get them first. Might catch them before they've warmed up and shaken the rust off. Further, the chance was not 25%. It was 33% because one team was ineligible for group A.
Here is the math.
Chance to be picked on first draw .25 1/4.
Chance of a second draw if not picked on first draw. 1/4 Chance to be picked on second draw 1/3
1/4 times 1/3 is 1/12 So they had a 1/12 chance of being picked on a second draw.
There is no chance of a third draw with just one team ineligible for group A.
So the chance of c-9 being picked in total was the chance of being picked on the first draw plus the chance of being picked on the second draw 1/4 or 3/12 plus 1/12 = 4/12 which is 1/3 or .333333333
Time to shock the world!! #C9WIN over SKT!!
Not likely, but until SKT wins, I'll run with the dream.
While that's a good winning streak to get into the group stage, the group stage is going to be rough no matter which one they get into.
But, you couldn't have asked for a better set of prep games for group stage. C9 looked sharp and ready to play. I would be nervous if I was in the group that gets stuck with C9 as a 4th team.
Now the real show begins though. Like don't get puffed up, we gotta hope they make it deeper than TSM.
Now the real show begins though. Like don't get puffed up, we gotta hope they make it deeper than TSM.
You know Sneaky will be going deep ;)
Perfect record against wild card teams XD lets see how they perform against teams I've heard of BEFORE the 2017 world's play-ins was announced.
Dire Wolves & Team One are "wild card" teams, but Lyon is legit. WhiteLotus is a monster
Dire Wolves & Team One are "wild card" teams, but Lyon is legit. WhiteLotus is a monster
The way Hong Kong Attitude played, they'd lose to Lyon.
Heck honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Fnatic lost to Lyon. I wouldn't expect it, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Heck honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Fnatic lost to Lyon. I wouldn't expect it, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Me either. I certainly wouldn't be surprised to see Lyon win a game. The series vs Fnatic. Tall order. But I could see one game easy. Maybe two and if things fell their way with some lucky crits, well anything can happen.
WhiteLotus scared me, honestly
I won't be surprised if WhiteLotus ends up in an LCS team next split. He was a pure beast.
Ok I'll give that to you. The first game of Lyon vs Dire Wolves white lotus popped off and I found a new appreciation for him. Maybe he'll replace doubleshit.
Wait wait, doubleL gets one more chance to prove himself this year. I don't hate the guy so lets see if he becomes tripleloss or not. :( sorry man.
Game 1 they won because they were handed a Kalista Thresh botlane (that should never happen on this patch) and got lucky with 2 infernals. Game 2 they should have lost, but again luck was on their side because Lyon didn't get the infernals C9 did. Instead they got 2 clouds and an ocean, so they couldn't snowball as hard. C9 relied on the tactic they often us (which I personally despise), bunker down, wait to late game, win 1 fight, win the game.
Yea, they got a clean sweep through the Play-ins, but they had luck on their side. C9 relies too often on luck for their wins. They don't stand a chance in group stages.
[{quoted}](name=Captain Tea,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=LwFEIEbh,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2017-09-29T07:15:18.071+0000)
Game 1 they won because they were handed a Kalista Thresh botlane (that should never happen on this patch) and got lucky with 2 infernals. Game 2 they should have lost, but again luck was on their side because Lyon didn't get the infernals C9 did. Instead they got 2 clouds and an ocean, so they couldn't snowball as hard. C9 relied on the tactic they often us (which I personally despise), bunker down, wait to late game, win 1 fight, win the game.
Yea, they got a clean sweep through the Play-ins, but they had luck on their side. C9 relies too often on luck for their wins. They don't stand a chance in group stages.
Do you EUW's go to school to learn excuse making or is that a God given gift?
[{quoted}](name=Captain Tea,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=LwFEIEbh,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2017-09-29T07:15:18.071+0000)
Game 1 they won because they were handed a Kalista Thresh botlane (that should never happen on this patch) and got lucky with 2 infernals. Game 2 they should have lost, but again luck was on their side because Lyon didn't get the infernals C9 did. Instead they got 2 clouds and an ocean, so they couldn't snowball as hard. C9 relied on the tactic they often us (which I personally despise), bunker down, wait to late game, win 1 fight, win the game.
Yea, they got a clean sweep through the Play-ins, but they had luck on their side. C9 relies too often on luck for their wins. They don't stand a chance in group stages.
The fact that they could pull off that strategy is less about luck and more execution. They were down a good chunk of that game, but pushed where they could, took victories here and there. True, Lyon should’ve closed out, but the fact that they has the early advantage and C9 was still able to stay in the game should say something about their skill level. That was less luck and more execution.
It’s a legitimate strategy. Just cause you despise it, doesn’t mean it’s not a good strategy when behind.
C9 plays very clean overall, and does not often make mistakes. That requires exceptional play. However they rely too much on the opponent throwing the game for them, then actually making plays themselves. When it comes down to it, they often play very safe, for the late game, hoping for the opponent to make a mistake. Meanwhile a lot of other teams still try to be pro-active and make plays, even from behind.
Is it an unfair strategy? No. Is C9 a bad team? No. But it is incredibly frustrating to watch, because it creates a situation of: C9 didn't win because they were good. They won because the opponent wasn't good enough.
I don't think a team should be able to win the early game to be considered good. But they should be proactive, and not rely on the opponent throwing the game, to be considered a good team.
This has been my main complaint about C9 for the past year or so as well. I can totally understand playing super defensive and taking no risks when you're down 5k gold with 3 inhibs down. BUT when you have elder, baron, all inhibs up, and are trying to seige the enemy team's base, as a viewer, I'm thinking "You wont have a better chance to end the game than right now," but then C9 says "We have an ok chance to end the game now....we think they'll screw up and give us a better chance than this so we're going to back off."
That shit might work against teams like Lyon, but if they think it's going to get them very far vs EDG and SKT, they probably wont make it out of groups.
I’ll give you that. It is frustrating to watch when you know they could be more proactive and close a match out faster. At the same time, there is a benefit to that type of style, which was shown in how they could stay afloat and turn around game 2. Games 1 and 3, at least from how I was seeing things, they were much more active early and pressing advantages when they had them (although I had only just listened to game 3 today at work, since I can’t actually watch videos on the job, so i might’ve missed something).
Clown 9 escaped a loss by using clearly broken balance. Game 2 should have been a loss. Shame on Riot.
This isn't solo queue, nobody cares about whether a champion is broken or not. The teams will be able to ban it or play around it or pick it for themselves.
Whether solo or 5v5 shouldn't matter. Fact is the champ and the meta is ugly as hell and should have been balanced before the World Championship tournament.
Then again, Ghostcrawler is lead design so...
Clown 9 escaped a loss by using clearly broken balance. Game 2 should have been a loss. Shame on Riot.
We went over this in another thread. Sour grapes. And yet the other team got that same broken character in game three and could do nothing with it. Further, it wasn't the broken character that pulled out that game.
Clown 9 escaped a loss by using clearly broken balance. Game 2 should have been a loss. Shame on Riot.
Nah
Sorry but the wildcard team despite having 6 kills and 2 towers over C9 could not make the gold lead more than 2.4k. That's why they lost.... any other major team in worlds would have demolished C9 but Lyon did not take full advantage and C9 hung in.
C9 is obviously going to win play ins
With that said, the uphill battle start now. Whatever group they join, will be hard...
NA MAN let's go!