I like it even more that Monte is his coach.
I know Monte likes to call it punditry, but there comes a point where you need to have a clue. I am not saying his predictions were unfounded but he rarely addresses them if they turn out wrong. When he does attempt to give credit where it's due it seems to follow with a disclaimer or backhanded caveat. It's okay to have Biases, (I know a lot of people feel differently about this point, but frankly I couldn't care less if an analyst or caster is likes a team as long as they are not disrespecting the other team) but when those biases start to cloud good judgement or even just simple observation; then its no longer opinion, its fanaticism.