[{quoted}](name=Paleo Electro,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=HHBrycot,comment-id=000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-19T10:31:57.873+0000)
Despite getting feedback from several other, far more reliable resources? As mentioned several times? And, I'm sorry, but I'm going to argue that it isn't feedback. It's just some pissed off player who isn't getting things their way, and not realizing that Riot has an entire world to appeal to.
Feedback from other sources is additional feedback, it does not replace feedback from another source. And even if a post is "riot sucks... because of X" it is still feedback. Period.
The whole point of an argument is to convince the other side that your view is right. How on Earth do you expect to do that with nothing but incoherent rage?
No one said it has to be an argument. The point is not the rage, the point is the message behind the rage. They are unhappy for a reason, that reason is what is important and is what is being overlooked.
I'm sorry, but......what? This makes no sense. I mean, I can't even explain why it makes no sense, because it is that confusing. You are saying that all feedback will be and goes ignored, because some of it is ignored. See how little sense this makes?
I'm not sure how it doesn't make sense to you, in fact I am having trouble reading what you wrote. That's not at all what I am saying, I am saying that Riot claims that it listens to our feedback, but in fact doesn't. If they are unwilling to listen to negative feedback, they can't claim they listen to all feedback, they need to revise their position as listening to only positive feedback. There is an important difference there.
Except it isn't their job. Every time a Rioter posts something on whatever social media platform, it is coming out of their own time. They are not paid to come onto the Boards and answer questions, they do it because they want to. Anything that is "official" (by how you are stating it) comes from Ask Riot, Dev Blogs, or anything that comes from official League of Legends profiles. Everything else is not "official".
Again, your missing the important distinction that needs to be made. There is a difference between "Fearless" commenting on something and "Riot Fearless" commenting on something. There is also a difference in Fearless not wanting to read something, and "Riot Fearless" refusing to comment on something that he is supposed to address. You completely missed the point.
The issue is not "Fearless" ignoring a bm thread, the issue is Riot not reading a feedback thread because it is negative and may hurt Fearless feelings.
And who's to say it doesn't? Someone else can say the exact same thing, but in a far more constructive and professional manner, and it will easily get noticed. This happens pretty much all the time: you have 1 thread bashing Riot left and right, making no real argument at all, but then just a few threads down, you have someone who actually thought something up, and made a very good point. The problem here isn't Riot, but how the Boards work. Which thread do you think will get more upvotes? The quick and easy "RITO SUKS!!1!", or the well thought out essay?
How it is said is not the issue, we realize being toxic isn't productive. We all know there are better ways to express themselves. The issue is that effectively Riot is saying they don't listen to negative feedback if it is toxic, but toxic or not it is still feedback that is then being ignored. It's not a matter of someone else may say it better, it is a matter of one person is heard and the other is not. It is censorship plain and simple, and it is a serious issue, especially if Riot wants to remain claiming that they listen to feedback. If Riot wants to claim that, then they need to listen to ALL feedback, not just the feedback that they find easy to hear.
As long as there is a point to their feedback, there is a voice that should be heard.