Dude, stop abusing your powers to remove content. Especially when you use reasoning that is subjective to a personal line of view. "This post does not support civil discussion." In some eyes, none of these boards do mate.
Mods remove whatever. I made a post asking why Zed wears make up and said he looks like a trap in the new skin. Apparently the rules say it's rude to call fictional characters traps
It is the moderator's role to remove posts that do not meet our definition of "civil discussion." We're not going to stop doing it just because there isn't unanimous agreement about what "civil" means in this context. We do have guiding principles, and we ask each other when it's borderline. If you have a problem with a specific removal or a specific moderator, we encourage you to join our discord and ask to speak to someone about it.
Vague statements pointing out that there may be disagreement about our methods isn't likely to change anything. It is inevitable that not everyone will agree on every part of the rules – nonetheless, we can't have a space like this without them. We're always willing to hear constructive feedback about the rules, even if that doesn't often result in a change.
Kinda depends on what you said. Without knowing that nobody can really say one way or the other really. But yeah, there are no real standards for the boards outside the most super blatant stuff and moderation is a crapshoot of whatever mod happens to get the report
I don't think it counts as name and shame with the mods, since, well, they're the mods.
