Could the meta become more than "excessive rolling or loose" - pretty pls!

Titanium70·7/2/2019, 3:39:26 PM·5 votes·5,188 views

I genuinely hate this strategy because it favors RNG win more than any other feature of the game.

As disclaimer if you dont know what I'm talking about: You can put every single gold you get early to race to as many 3-Stars as possible as fast as possible. Going on win streak because of it and snowball to a very early victory since the DMG said 3-Stars can inflict on scaling comps is beyond crazy (25% and more).

IMO this "strategy" - if you wanna call it one - crowds out pretty much everything else. So many poeple are doing it, neglecting core elements of the game and still doing well. Sore Item choices and bad to nonexistance compositions do not matter since multiple 3-Stars can simply Stat-Check you to death. When you see someone win the round with a total of Noble3, Blademaster3 and no other synergy in a 7-man-team wins the game VS two other fully stacked 8 and 9 man comps it's a good indication that something is not going as it should be.

I don't hate that the strategy is doing well - I hate the fact that I'm forced to do the same - not only to win, but also to survive in comps the need their time! But what's more important is RNG involved in the startegy makes me hate it. Even with reroll spam, you have no guarantee getting you 3-Stars OR getting the much needed Win-Streak. In games with multiple people doing it this gets even more obvious due to the limited champion pool. For every guy once again winning with this riddiculous comps there are 2-3 total failures that get one Level 3 and nothing else. (BTW Them loosing (and quitting which is another problem) fast resulting in more fights with the lucky dude also makes playing against this worse). Doing this is 100% relying on RNG. High risk, High reward might sound interesting for some people, but this strategy is straight up gambling at this point and anything but interesting to play against.

It's not fun winning against the failures. It's not fun loosing to the lucky one.

And no neither do I hate 3-Stars in generall they are fine and should be your goal to maximize your comp nor di I jsut loose to one. I fact I just one against this exact matchup I described. A few total failiures not worth watching to fight, one guy with SIX 3-Stars! (I won because itemized Kayle is OP). Would I have choosen to scale I would have been eliminated far earlier. But by jumping on the damn train and rushing for 3 early 3-Stars as well I was A) able to fight back, and B) able to interrrupt his winstreak from time to time.

It was an interesting round - but not really fun to play.

OK there you have my few cent - feel free to share your oppinions. Would you nerf it. And if you'd do that. HOW?

Since I dont really know an effective way.

  • Increasing the chance for 3-stars? Giving you access to enough to fight back without ven trying?
  • Decresaing the chance? But this would make T1 Champs alomost entirely useless.
  • Decrease the HP-DMG to give you more time scaling against them? Would hardcore favor T4/5 to a dagerous point.

Closing - since I never said this yet. I really enjoy the game overall, Riot you've created a really fun experience, bringing back some strategy I tend to miss in LOL during the last years and I hope you will give this game the support it deserves.

14 Comments

Panthaz897/2/2019, 6:30:50 PM2 votes

With leveling and getting 7 or more two stars you can easily beat those who upgraded their t1 champs to lvl 3...t4 champs at lvl 2 are better except Leona. Now If they get an absurd amount of items and win because of that that's something entirely different but rerolling like a mad man isnt meta and doesn't consistently work which means it's certainly not meta. Going glacier ranger void assassins big Nobles is meta.

Kazekiba7/2/2019, 4:10:12 PM1 votes

"Can the RNG game please be less RNG?"

Play ... literally anything else?

Acekill3r7/2/2019, 6:24:29 PM1 votes

There are way stronger strats, when ranked will be up those players will not climb too much anyway, chill.

Furious Delisha7/2/2019, 7:49:26 PM1 votes

T3s are nice, but honestly not that great. I have won many games with just T2s. My brother has won with 5 T1 champs in his lineup before. Yes, Five tier 1 champions.

I've also beaten people who've amassed 4 Tier 3s simply because my strat was better than theirs.

Abusing level ups and synergy bonuses are much more imprtant than champion levels.

I regularly win by having 6-8 different team bonuses active.

Glacial, Assassin, Ninja, Maxed Wild, Sorcerer, Demon, Imperial, Blademaster and Maxed Yordle are all insanely good.

ModCaptainMårvelous7/2/2019, 8:44:10 PM1 votes

You're in luck!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BorEH1K5JM0&feature=youtu.be

Reroll strat was nerfed hard.

iainB857/2/2019, 10:44:38 PM1 votes

Really? I tend to win more when I go the economy route and bank gold for interest rather than rapidly rolling to level up common heroes ASAP.

Yeah, you lose some health in the beginning but getting early carousel picks and gold interest I've had plenty of comebacks beating that guy with 4 common 3 star champions with 2 star elite/legendaries in the end.

I don't know that the game is old enough for anyone to truly know what the strongest "metas" are at this stage, but I feel like the meta you are complaining about isn't as strong as you think it is.